Category: Electric Vehicle

  • What’s Next for EV Battery Technology?

    What’s Next for EV Battery Technology?

    Electric vehicles are less complex than gasoline-powered ones. They lack gas tanks, pistons, spark plugs, and tailpipes. Assembly specialist Chris Rehrig explains that the concept involves fewer parts, amidst the plant’s noise.

    Offline, they are equipped with large batteries. At Volkswagen, battery packs weighing over 1,000 pounds will be assembled across the street and transport in by autonomous vehicles. Each battery pack, encased in a plate with cooling fluid, will be attached to a car’s underbody using automated tools.

    When a gasoline-powered car approaches, the same machine will instead install a heat shield. Ensuring a smooth operation will require coordination, as noted by Noah Walker, Rehrig’s supervisor.

    The fact that Volkswagen and many others are now attempting this transition indicates a critical moment for the planet. The company and the industry are shifting away from what made Volkswagen the world’s largest manufacturing company by revenue: the carbon dioxide-emitting internal combustion engine.

    As more individuals and governments advocate for urgent action on climate change, cars and trucks are experiencing their most significant transformation since their inception over a century ago. Both startups and established companies are vying for a position in what industry leaders now view as the most promising path forward: vehicles with no tailpipe emissions.

    By almost every metric, their popularity is rapidly increasing. Overnight, the era of the electric car has arrived.

    However, the transition away from gasoline-powered vehicles remains too slow to address the climate challenge within the necessary timeframe. Greenhouse gas emissions are on the rise, resulting in extreme droughts and wildfires from the Arctic to Australia, and breaking global temperature records.

    Melting ice sheets are causing sea levels to rise, leading to increased flooding and more severe storms. To avert danger for millions of people, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change states that the world needs to eliminate carbon dioxide emissions by 2050, preferably even sooner.

    With nearly a quarter of global emissions stemming from all types of transportation, can we quickly reduce our dependence on gasoline-powered cars to avoid the most severe consequences? And can we do so without causing new environmental disasters? Several emerging companies and many traditional players are now staking their future—and ours—on the belief that millions of consumers are finally ready to make the switch.

    It’s difficult to argue that we are witnessing anything less than a revolution. In the 1990s, General Motors introduced an electric car, produced fewer than 1,200 units, and recalled them. Today, the pace of change is rapid.

    The number of all-electric and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (EVs) increased by nearly half last year, despite an overall 16 percent decrease in car sales. The variety of models available to drivers worldwide expanded by 40 percent, totaling about 370.

    In North America, the variety is projected to nearly triple by 2024, reaching 138. Electric Mini Coopers, Porsches, and Harley-Davidsons are already on the market.

    Governments from California to China, Japan, and the United Kingdom have recently announced plans to prohibit the sale of new passenger vehicles powered solely by gas or diesel by 2035 or sooner. Automotive giants such as Volvo and Jaguar now say they will phase out piston engines by then, while Ford states that its passenger vehicles in Europe will be all EVs or hybrids in five years and all electric by 2030.

    GM has committed to achieving carbon neutrality by 2040. President Joe Biden has vowed to transition the federal fleet of over 600,000 vehicles to EVs, and his administration plans to tighten fuel-efficiency standards.

    Wall Street and investors are making substantial bets. At one point last year, Tesla, which was responsible for almost 80 percent of all US EV sales in 2020, was valued higher than oil giants ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell, and BP combined. New electric car and electric truck companies continue to emerge: Bollinger, Faraday Future, Nio, Byton.

    Others are gaining traction as well. A two-door electric micro-car with a top speed of 62 miles per hour and a starting price below $6,000 has been outselling Tesla in China, which is home to over 40 percent of the world’s plug-in vehicles.

    The days of light-duty combustion engines appear to be truly numbered. “The dam is breaking; the tipping point is here,” says Sam Ricketts, a member of the team that authored Washington governor Jay Inslee’s climate action plan during his presidential run. Many of Inslee’s later ideas found their way into Biden’s climate plans.

    “Electrifying transportation is our future. I think that train has left the station,” says Kristin Dziczek, an economist with the Center for Automotive Research, a Michigan-based organization partially backed by car manufacturers.

    Even before the successful mass production of the Prius hybrid by Toyota over twenty years ago, some environmentally conscious countries had started to tighten emissions standards. For example, in Norway, where half of the new vehicles on the road in 2020 were electric, incentives such as tax savings for electric cars were introduced.

    In China, cities dealing with air pollution issues streamlined the registration process for electric vehicles, making it faster and more cost-effective compared to vehicles with internal combustion engines. The US government also provided consumers with incentives of up to $7,500 for the purchase of electric vehicles and hybrids, while also investing in battery research and development.

    In 2009, Tesla received a $465 million loan from the Department of Energy to kick-start sedan production. Over the next decade, battery prices dropped by 89 percent, and Tesla managed to sell 1.5 million plug-in vehicles.

    However, there is still a long way to go. Globally, approximately 12 million plug-in cars and trucks have been sold, with nearly 90 percent of them in just three regions: China, Europe, and the United States. Despite this progress, there are still around 1.5 billion traditional gasoline-powered vehicles on the roads, and the total number of passenger vehicles, of all types, is projected to increase by another billion over the next 30 years due to rising incomes in underdeveloped countries.

    The rapid adoption of electric vehicles by drivers worldwide depends on various factors. The industry is addressing some of the major obstacles for consumers, such as range, recharging times, charging infrastructure, and cost. For instance, a laboratory prototype of a solid-state battery could potentially enable electric vehicles to be recharged in just 10 minutes. Additionally, companies like Tesla and Lucid Motors are already developing all-electric vehicles that could exceed 400 miles per charge.

    Lucid claims its car will surpass 500 miles, while Aptera suggests that some drivers of its three-wheeled, aerodynamic, solar-powered vehicle may never need to visit a charging station. Although most new electric vehicles are currently luxury cars that are out of reach for many consumers, investment bank UBS and research firm BloombergNEF predict that electric cars could achieve cost parity with conventional vehicles in approximately five years.

    Nevertheless, analysts emphasize that more action is needed to accelerate this transition. It is not expected that the variety of options for consumers will match the range of choices available for traditional gasoline-powered vehicles in the near future. Government incentives, such as the reinstatement of the $7,500 tax credit, which is no longer available for certain automakers, may be crucial in attracting buyers.

    According to Dziczek, “There isn’t a market in the world that can do this without some kind of public investment.” The Biden administration has proposed a $15 billion investment to help install 500,000 charging stations, but this has faced resistance from many in Congress.

    The price and sustainability of electric vehicles also hinge on the availability of raw materials. EV batteries rely on materials such as lithium, nickel, cobalt, manganese, and graphite, most of which are mined in a few specific locations, with much of the refining taking place in China. With demand on the rise, nations that manufacture electric vehicles are working to secure supplies, including plans for a lithium mine in Nevada.

    However, according to Jonathon Mulcahy of the research firm Rystad Energy, which projects potential lithium shortages later this decade, “there’s no point in having a lithium mine in America, shipping the lithium out to Asia for processing, then shipping it back to America for use in your batteries.”

    At the same time, the extraction of these metals has led to environmental and human rights concerns. Entities like the European Union are grappling with ways to ensure stability,, and safe supply chains, while ethical automakers, including Volkswagen, are implementing auditing and certification systems to ensure that battery suppliers adhere to environmental and labor regulations.

    Consumers may be hesitant to trust these commitments, as automakers have previously let them down. For example, when issues arise on Volkswagen’s Chattanooga assembly line, production is halted by workers pulling cords, and a distinctive song plays across the factory floor to identify the cause of the delay. During a tour, Scott Joplin’s “The Entertainer” was heard, signaling a stoppage in operations. However, on that particular day, significant progress was being made, such as the installation of special robots needed for EV production, the securing of new parts suppliers by buyers, and preparations for the hiring of hundreds more workers by executives.

    The groundwork for this moment was laid in 1979 when Tennessee governor Lamar Alexander traveled to Japan with maps and a satellite photograph to persuade the chairman of Nissan that his state offered ideal manufacturing land connected by rail and highway to major population centers on both coasts. This led to other carmakers following suit, and today, this conservative state plays a role in the shift towards eco-friendly vehicles.

    From 2013, the Nissan factory in Smyrna, located outside Nashville, has been producing the electric Leaf, the first commercially successful modern EV. Priced at under $25,000 after tax credits, it remains one of the most affordable options in North America.

    Approximately 40 miles away, GM is investing two billion dollars to revamp its Spring Hill plant in order to manufacture an electric Cadillac, which will be the first of several EVs to be produced there. By 2023, the entire operation will be powered by solar energy .

    The company is also dedicating $2.3 billion to establish a battery plant that will provide employment for 1,300 individuals. Additionally, the Tennessee Valley Authority, responsible for operating hydroelectric dams and other power plants, intends to finance fast-charging stations along Tennessee’s highways, with stations available every 50 miles.

    Then there’s Chattanooga. In 1969, a year before the inception of the Environmental Protection Agency, the US government labeled the city’s particulate-matter pollution as the most severe in the country. Its ozone pollution was second only to that of Los Angeles.

    After years of revitalization, the city achieved one of the most noteworthy environmental successes in history. In 2008, shortly after the city met ozone standards, Volkswagen initiated the construction of its new plant.

    The Volkswagen Group, which includes Audi, Porsche, and nine other carmakers, has embraced EVs. This is partly due to the emissions scandal that came to light in 2014, resulting in substantial fines, the recall of millions of cars, and the indictment of its former CEO on conspiracy charges.

    As part of a settlement with the EPA for installing devices on approximately 590,000 diesel vehicles sold in the US that misrepresented their pollution levels, the company was required to make substantial investments in EV charging infrastructure. However, this alone does not fully explain Volkswagen’s profound shift towards EVs.

    The company is allocating over $40 billion globally to develop 70 new electric models and manufacture 26 million of them by 2030. In collaboration with partners, VW anticipates installing 3,500 fast chargers in the US by the end of the year and 18,000 in Europe by 2025.

    Volkswagen has invested $300 million in a battery start-up aimed at reducing charging times by half. The company is also constructing and expanding battery plants across Europe with the goal of halving battery prices.

    Nic Lutsey, director of the electric-vehicle program for the International Council on Clean Transportation, which provides data and analysis to aid governments in promoting environmentally friendly transportation, acknowledges Volkswagen’s substantial investments in EVs, stating, “It is absolutely clear that VW, among the large automakers, is by far making the largest investments in EVs.” It was Lutsey’s organization that first uncovered Volkswagen’s emission cheating.

    Scott Keogh, CEO of Volkswagen Group of America, grew up in the 1970s on Long Island, riding in the back of his family’s VW Beetle. He pursued a degree in comparative literature and engaged in development projects in Bolivia before entering the automotive industry, initially at Mercedes-Benz and later at Audi. In 2018, following the EPA settlement, he assumed leadership of VW’s North American business.

    Keogh acknowledges the emissions scandal as a corporate disaster, describing it as a significant setback for the company. However, he emphasizes the company’s decision to emerge from the crisis stronger, more resilient, and purpose-driven.

    Volkswagen announced its commitment to EVs so early that when the plan was presented to US car dealers, Keogh notes that it was met with skepticism. Not long ago, dealers assumed EVs would remain a niche market.

    Keogh asserts that this perception has since evolved. He regularly receives research indicating that, under optimistic scenarios, electric vehicles could account for 50 percent of car purchases within the next decade. Suddenly, VW’s investments appear astute and imperative.

    However, Keogh is well aware of the challenges ahead. Currently, all-electric vehicles constitute less than 5 percent of new-car sales in Europe and 2 percent in the US (The figure rises to 8 percent in China.) Keogh anticipates that, within 10 years, this percentage could reach 30 to 40 percent. Counting on such rapid growth is certainly a source of concern.

    Nevertheless, Keogh does not perceive Tesla or other EV manufacturers as the primary competitors. His target audience consists of individuals considering the purchase of small gas-powered SUVs, such as Toyota’s RAV4 or Subaru’s Forester. He emphasizes the company’s intense focus on the 98 percent of the market not currently driving an electric vehicle.

    At the start, there was a similar competition for consumers’ attention. In 1896, during a major car exhibition in London, potential buyers were faced with a choice between electric and gas-powered vehicles, as horses and buggies still vied with automobiles. Some Aspects of this choice remain unchanged.

    The British Medical Journal noted that electricity had the advantage of being odorless and producing less noise and vibration, but it was hindered by the cost of batteries and the limitation of recharging only where electric supply was available.

    When the first US auto dealership opened in Detroit a few years later, it exclusively sold electric cars. In Austria, Ferdinand Porsche’s early designs also relied on electricity. His partner, Ludwig Lohner, favored electric drives due to the already high pollution from petrol engines in Vienna. However, the availability of cheap oil and improved rural roads led to the dominance of gasoline-powered vehicles. Electric vehicles disappeared by the end of the 1930s.

    In Normal, Illinois, I met a man with a unique vision for reviving electric vehicles. In 2015, Mitsubishi closed its auto plant in the area, resulting in the layoff of nearly 1,300 workers. Two years later, engineer and entrepreneur Robert “RJ” Scaringe repurposed the vacant space to establish a factory for his startup, Rivian.

    Scaringe, a slim man in his late 30s, with an unassuming demeanor, was seen standing in line at the cafeteria on a day when his company’s value was nearly $28 billion.

    Even as a Florida teenager working on Porsches in a neighbor’s garage, Scaringe was determined to build cars. During his time at MIT, where he obtained a doctorate in mechanical engineering, his concerns about climate change became a major focus.

    As we toured the old Mitsubishi plant before Rivian’s new vehicles went into production, Scaringe described his mission as finding a way to transition approximately 90 to 100 million cars to electric power.

    Scaringe chose to focus on designing electric vehicles that consumers would desire. What do consumers desire most? Some of the least fuel-efficient vehicles on the road. There are now over 200 million SUVs worldwide, six times more than a decade ago, and millions more trucks.

    In the US, together they accounted for 70 percent of the new-vehicle market in 2019. “Not only is it the biggest problem in terms of carbon and sustainability… but they’re also the most popular vehicle type,” Scaringe remarked .

    Rivian’s first two electric vehicles, a short-bed pickup named the R1T and an SUV called the R1S, will provide environmentally friendly options for outdoor enthusiasts. Similar to Tesla, the company is establishing its own dedicated charging network: 3,500 fast chargers on highways, and thousands more in state parks and near trailheads.

    Scaringe felt compelled to do so. While most charging occurs at home, he explained that a patchy and inconsistent charging network complicates long trips and remains “a reason for someone not to buy the vehicle.”

    Rivian won’t be the only player in the truck market. Tesla has unveiled its Cybertruck, and an electric version of Ford’s F-150, the most popular vehicle in America with annual sales approaching 900,000 in 2019, is expected in 2022.

    The base price for the F-150 Lightning will be considerably lower than Rivian’s high-end vehicles. Within a month of its debut, over 100,000 customers had made reservations.

    Ford is an investor in Rivian, and Scaringe is optimistic about the competition; he is quick to emphasize that a complete shift to electric vehicles cannot be achieved by any single company. However, he and his team also recognize that our relationship with vehicles is changing in ways that could support the adoption of electric vehicles.

    “Fifteen years ago, if we wanted bananas, we’d go to the store. If I wanted new shoes, I’d drive to the store,” he stated. Now, deliveries bring books, meals, groceries, and shoes to our door. Others make trips for us. In that, Scaringe sees an opportunity.

    What if he could convert a fleet of delivery trucks to electric vehicles? “You may, as a customer, not yet choose to switch to electric for your personal vehicle. But because you’re outsourcing a significant portion of your last-mile logistics, you will now be transitioning to electricity whether you realize it or not.”

    Rivian is producing 100,000 electric delivery vehicles for Amazon, the retail giant. Some are currently being tested on the streets. FedEx has also announced its plan to go electric. UPS has taken a stake in another electric vehicle company and is purchasing 10,000 electric delivery vans .

    Scaringe is considering the developing world, where few individuals own new cars and trucks, and the relationship with vehicles is fundamentally different. He anticipates the emergence of new user models there, such as partial ownership, flexible leasing, and subscription services.

    Rather than witnessing the spread of new gas-powered vehicles in regions like Africa and India, he believes the solution is to innovate on the product, business model, and ecosystem to enable these markets to bypass the inefficient and dirty transportation systems seen in the US , Europe, and China.

    In Nairobi’s industrial district, warehouses house various businesses, including a unique venture where employees work on converting old petroleum-powered transit vehicles into electric vehicles and building affordable electric motorcycles, while also providing financing options.

    Opibus, a startup aiming to bring electrification to developing countries, is not only converting old petroleum-powered transit vehicles into electric vehicles but also constructing new, inexpensive electric motorcycles.

    Wairimu, an engineer at Opibus, emphasizes the opportunity to have a better vision for Africa, where many places lack gas stations and where the majority of vehicles are older ones imported used.

    The developing world presents a significant untapped market, which traditional vehicle manufacturers find daunting, according to chief strategist Albin Wilson.

    The number of gas- and diesel-powered vehicles in parts of East Africa is roughly doubling each decade, with the majority of vehicles being older ones imported used. Opibus is one of the few organizations trying to lay the groundwork for change, given the lack of focus from major vehicle manufacturers on this emerging market.

    Opibus initially created conversion kits for safari companies, then transitioned to building electric motorcycles, which have been well received due to their lower cost for fuel and maintenance.

    According to Wilson, many motorcycle owners in the region are primarily interested in whether electrification will improve their livelihoods and help them earn more money.

    Similar to promote electrification efforts are taking place in other developing countries, including EV start-ups in Rwanda and Ethiopia, as well as experiments with electric postal vehicles in the Philippines and potential electric buses in the Seychelles.

    Wairimu believes that transitioning to electric vehicles could have a significant positive impact on East Africa and the world as a whole, particularly in the face of climate change and its potential threats to agriculture.

    The interest in electric vehicles is currently at a peak, with a 55% increase in new EV sales in 2022 compared to the previous year. However, there is still a large number of gasoline cars on the roads, and it is likely to remain so for the foreseeable future.

    A growing industry is revitalizing internal combustion vehicles by converting them to electric power, and both the shops and aftermarket community are expanding significantly to meet the increasing demand.

    “This is a 1976 BMW 2002 — a really enjoyable car to drive but lacking in power,” according to Michael Bream, CEO and founder of EV West, as reported by CNBC. “This particular customer opted for what we call ‘the whole hog ,’ and is installing the 550 horsepower Tesla drive unit in this car.”

    Bream’s shop, located in San Diego, California, is a pioneer in EV conversions and has gained significant popularity, resulting in a four-to-five-year waitlist.

    “Being involved in electric cars right now is akin to being involved in computers in the ’90s… We want this shift to sustainable fuels to be engaging and enjoyable for car enthusiasts and automobile culture participants,” explained Bream.

    In addition to conversion shops, there is a growing community of DIYers undertaking these projects themselves. While the complexity of electric vehicles can be daunting, 14-year-old Frances Farnam is undeterred. She is working on converting a 1976 Porsche 914, which she acquired three years ago and has been documenting the process on her YouTube channel, Tinkergineering.

    “I’ve always wanted an electric car, and my mom has a BMW i3,” said Frances. “I hope that by doing this, I can prove that it’s not too challenging… I’m simply doing this in my backyard with my dad.”

    She has recently completed priming the car for paint and is preparing to rebuild it. The 914 internet community has been invaluable in assisting her and her father throughout the entire process.

    To learn about working with electrical systems, she took a course with Legacy EV, an electric vehicle aftermarket shop, which taught her the intricacies of performing a conversion.

    The aftermarket ecosystem for electric vehicles appears to be expanding, with an array of EV-focused parts available to support individuals like Frances who aspire to build their own electric car. Notably, both Ford and GM offer components for EV conversions, and numerous other companies are entering this space. According to the Specialty Equipment Market Association, a trade organization representing automotive manufacturers and resellers, the number of EV-focused products in the market has grown significantly.

    “We began two years ago at SEMA with an EV section at the show,” said Mike Spagnola, president and CEO of SEMA. “It encompassed 2,000 square feet. This past year, it expanded to 22,000 square feet… I’m confident that in the next five years, it will reach 100,000 square feet.”

    Can AI aid in the discovery of rare metals such as cobalt and copper for the electrification of global vehicles?

    Securing access to rare Earth minerals is a crucial national security concern, given the significant dependence of the entire United States’ economy on minerals, the majority of which have been discovered in China so far.

    The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) has collaborated with a company called HyperSpectral, which utilizes artificial intelligence to analyze spectroscopic data. This could prove instrumental in using satellites or drones to locate minerals that would otherwise be challenging to detect.

    HyperSpectral CEO Matt Thereur provided an exclusive interview to Defense One, explaining how the process works. Spectroscopy involves the study of how matter interacts with light or other forms of radiation across different wavelengths.

    The unique molecular makeup of a specific mineral or substance emits distinctive solar radiation, serving as a unique identifier.

    Previously, the company focused on food safety. Whether it concerns identifying potentially harmful pathogens in large food shipments or detecting a new outbreak of medication-resistant streptococcus, spectroscopy can aid in uncovering bacteria that are imperceptible to the naked eye.

    “At present, the existing procedures take a couple of days to distinguish between drug-resistant and drug-sensitive staphylococcus bacteria, as they need to culture the bacteria, apply antibiotics, and observe the response. This is in contrast to our approach, where we typically provide results within a few minutes based on a swab from a wound, rather than several days,” Thereur explained.

    How does AI come into play? According to Thereur, “Pure samples do not occur naturally. Nature is a very noisy environment. Therefore, when we construct these models using artificial intelligence, we seek out all the relationships that may be obscured by the noise , such as when one section of the spectrum is influenced by another substance within it.”

    Furthermore, there are various types of spectroscopic nesting that are not easily amalgamated into a comprehensive data overview, and this is where AI plays a role. Just as AI-driven transcription and translation are made possible by combining auditory data from human speech with textual data related to the likelihood of specific combinations of letters and words, the same principle could apply to spectroscopic data from diverse sources.

    “Understanding the spectrographic response of materials, whether through absorbance, reflectance, Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy, Raman, or surface-enhanced Raman, is crucial for differentiating between various materials,” explained Thereur.

    Thereur highlighted that the DEA used a similar technique to distinguish between cocaine originating from different areas of Colombia.

    According to Thereur, the cooperative agreement with DARPA is still in its early stages, and the potential Defense Department applications for better material understanding are extensive.

    Spectroscopy can be conducted using specific satellites, making it valuable for intelligence collection, such as identifying specific materials used in enemy equipment or vehicles.

    The Pentagon is interested in improving access to rare Earth materials and relocating the production of essential weapons and supplies closer to the front lines, reducing reliance on vulnerable supply lines in the Pacific.

    “There are numerous applications and use cases for analyzing spectral data. There is a significant amount,” stated Thereur.

    A machine learning model can forecast the locations of minerals on Earth and potentially other planets by leveraging patterns in mineral associations. The scientific community and industry are interested in locating mineral deposits to gain insights into our planet’s history and for use in technologies like rechargeable batteries.

    Shaunna Morrison, Anirudh Prabhu, and their colleagues aimed to develop a tool for identifying occurrences of specific minerals, a task that has historically been legendary on individual experience and luck.

    The team created a machine learning model that utilizes data from the Mineral Evolution Database to predict previously unknown mineral occurrences based on association rules. The model was tested in the Tecopa basin in the Mojave Desert, a well-known Mars analog environment.

    The model successfully predicted the locations of geologically important minerals, including uraninite alteration, rutherfordine, andersonite, and schröckingerite, bayleyite, and zippeite.

    Additionally, the model identified promising areas for critical rare earth element and lithium minerals, including monazite-(Ce), and allanite-(Ce), and spodumene. The authors suggested that mineral association analysis could be a powerful predictive tool for mineralogists, petrologists , economic geologists, and planetary scientists.

    According to the International Energy Forum, between 35 and 194 new mines will be required by 2050 to meet technology and energy demands. These new mines are not small-scale coal mines but major operations related to rare earth metals.

    Recognizing that few new mines have been opened in the US over the years, this presents a significant challenge. The methods for identifying geographic locations with potential rare earth metal deposits have not kept pace with the times.

    However, the innovative use of AI in mining exploration appears to be changing this. An AI model for rare earth mining is currently undergoing testing and has shown promising results.

    One company, KoBold Metals, achieved a major breakthrough using AI in mining exploration by locating a large copper deposit deep beneath the surface in Zambia. This discovery generated significant excitement due to the demand for copper and other rare earth metals.

    To keep up with the demand for rare earth metals, such discoveries need to occur multiple times a year. It is hoped that the new AI model for rare earth mining will lead to a surge in these resources.

    In this context, AI could potentially serve as both a supplier and consumer of these metals. With substantial investment in these endeavors, it is evident that a solution is needed, and many believe AI will play a crucial role.

    The AI ​​Model for Rare Earth Mining

    Unlike traditional mining exploration, KoBold has taken a different approach. A key aspect of this approach involves a device that was originally developed to identify dark matter.

    When efforts to find dark matter proved unsuccessful, the technologies were repurposed for other applications, including the identification and location of rare earth metals.

    In essence, after preliminary research narrows down potential sites, a hole is drilled, sometimes deep below the earth’s surface. The technology is then utilized to identify minute subatomic particles and assess density readings to profile key metals, such as copper, lithium, cobalt, and nickel. AI plays a significant role in mining exploration projects like this.

    The scientific principles behind this AI model for rare earth mining have been applied in some unusual situations. For instance, it has been used to uncover ancient Egyptian burial tombs and to identify underground tunnels potentially used for unauthorized border crossings.

    The application of AI in mining exploration is a new development and is showing significant potential. KoBold is at the forefront utilizing this technology, receiving substantial financial support from venture capitalists worldwide as well as from governments, including the US If this AI model for rare earth mining consistently delivers results, it has the potential to revolutionize the mining industry.

    KoBold, which commenced operations approximately five years ago, recognized the early potential of AI in mining exploration. Rather than abandoning traditional mining exploration practices, the company integrated them with its AI model for rare earth mining. For example, Cessna planes are still used to conductor radar and magnetic readings to investigate potential metal deposits underground, and historical research and ground sampling are also routinely employed. All this information, along with AI drilling data, is combined to create KoBold’s Terrashed, a 3D model that integrates tens of millions of documents and data points to assist in metal discoveries.

    In terms of operations, KoBold has made substantial investments, with approximately $2.3 billion already invested in a recent copper discovery in Zambia. The company also controls a significant percentage of ownership in this mine. Additionally, KoBold has secured significant funding from private equity firms in the US and Europe, and has received substantial government support. The US has committed to building a railway in Zambia to facilitate copper exporting for KoBold, and negotiations are ongoing with Zambia regarding ownership rights to the mine.

    Assuming KoBold’s AI model for rare earth mining continues to perform well, the company is poised for success. It already has around 60 mining projects in progress, with AI in mining exploration driving future endeavors as well.

    One could argue that KoBold’s AI model for rare earth mining emerged at the right time, almost like a chicken and egg scenario. While AI in mining exploration represents a significant advancement, it also contributes to the problem. The energy requirements of AI are substantial, and rare earth metals are essential for developing energy solutions. In addition to their role in consumer goods, rare earth metals are also crucial for power grid solutions and large-scale battery storage facilities necessary for storing wind and solar energies. Moreover, these resources are also needed for advanced weaponry. While AI mining advancements are proving to be timely, they have also fueled the rising demand for rare earth metals.

    Assuming KoBold’s copper discovery in Zambia can be effectively mined, it has the potential to generate billions of dollars annually, with revenues projected to persist for decades. However, this is just one mine for a single rare earth metal, and many more will be needed . The use of AI in mining exploration holds promise in addressing this demand. Initial indications from KoBold’s AI model for rare earth mining and its copper discovery support this potential, and this breakthrough couldn’t have come at a better time.

    KoBold is not the only mining company embracing big data to facilitate the next wave of discoveries. However, its prominent financiers and focus on metals essential for the green energy revolution are drawing attention to an emerging bottleneck in raw materials that could impede global efforts, including those negotiated at the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Scotland, aimed at creating a less carbon-intensive world.

    According to the International Energy Agency, achieving the central goal of the 2015 Paris Climate Agreement to keep global warming “well below” 2 degrees Celsius will necessitate unprecedented growth in the production of commodities like copper, cobalt, nickel, and lithium. These materials are essential for solar panels, wind turbines, power lines, and, most importantly, battery-powered electric vehicles, which are less carbon intensive, especially when powered by renewable energy sources.

    In 2040, the IEA predicts that meeting the Paris targets will necessitate over 70 million electric cars and trucks to be sold globally each year, which will require up to 30 times more metals than are currently used in their production.

    Transitioning to a sustainable future presents challenges, especially in the near term. While advancements in technology and stricter regulations have reduced the environmental impact of mining, the extraction and processing of metals still pollute water and soil, encroach on habitats, and release pollutants and greenhouse gases.

    Emissions associated with the minerals used in green energy technologies are a small fraction of those produced by the fossil fuel-powered systems they aim to replace. With the acceleration of electric vehicle adoption, increased battery recycling could reduce the necessity for new battery metals.

    Other solutions under development, such as hydrogen-fueled cars, or yet-to-be-imagined technologies, could share the burden of green transportation. However, analysts emphasize that there is currently no alternative to extracting rocks from the Earth.

    Limiting warming to below 2 degrees Celsius using existing technologies will require a “massive additional volume of metals,” according to Julian Kettle, senior vice president of mining and metals at Wood Mackenzie, a global energy consultancy. “There’s simply no way around that. ”

    Established in 2018, KoBold derives its name from cobalt, a shiny bluish-silver metal crucial for the performance of lithium-ion batteries that revolutionized consumer electronics in the early 1990s.

    These batteries are now used on a larger scale in electric vehicles, and cobalt improves their range, lifespan, and protection against fires by reducing corrosion.

    However, its supply is particularly precarious, with nearly 70 percent sourced from the Democratic Republic of the Congo, where a history of labor abuses corruption and has gas the urgency to find deposits elsewhere.

    Automakers are also exploring cobalt alternatives due to its high cost, but the limitations of current cobalt-free batteries make it likely that demand for cobalt will increase.

    Other metals sought by KoBold could also face shortages. Gerbrand Ceder, a materials scientist at the University of California, Berkeley, believes nickel is at the greatest risk of long-term shortages, partially because it is the most viable substitute for cobalt.

    Analysts also anticipate a shortage of copper, which is used in various green technologies, including electric vehicle motors, wiring, and charging infrastructure. A typical battery-powered car uses three times as much copper as traditional vehicles.

    These supply constraints have arisen because finding viable metal deposits has become more challenging. This is largely due to the depletion of accessible deposits. In Zambia, Africa’s second-largest copper producer, the ores currently mined were either easily accessible or just below the surface when discovered, according to David Broughton, a geologist with 25 years’ experience in the region who advises KoBold and others.

    However, this does not mean that there are no deposits deeper in the earth. The interaction between rocks and fluids that formed them over 400 million years ago occurred deep beneath the surface.

    Unlike the oil and gas industry, which has significantly improved its access to hard-to-reach places, mining exploration has not experienced a major technological leap in decades.

    As a result, the likelihood of success is very low. According to most industry estimates, fewer than one percent of projects in areas without extensive prior exploration result in commercially viable deposits.

    KoBold aims to “reduce the uncertainty of what’s under the surface,” according to Josh Goldman, the company’s chief technology officer. Enhanced data application and advancements in artificial intelligence are crucial for improving the odds of success.

    AI techniques, including automation and machine learning, have already aided the fight against climate change by enabling better tracking of emissions, more advanced climate modeling, and the development of energy-saving devices such as smart grids.

    While AI applications in mining have mainly focused on improving extraction from existing operations, there is a growing trend in using them to assist in the search for new deposits.

    Today, companies ranging from tech giants like IBM to specialized firms like Canada’s Minerva and GoldSpot offer AI tools or services tailored to exploration. KoBold, however, is one of the few companies that invests its own capital in projects, including its ventures in Zambia and other locations in Canada, Greenland, and Western Australia.

    The company’s impressive technology includes two complementary systems. Connie Chan, a partner at the venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz, which invested in KoBold in 2019 along with Gates’ Breakthrough Energy Ventures, compares the first system to a “Google Maps for the Earth’s crust and below.”

    Creating this technology is like a treasure hunt in geology. KoBold not only gathers its own data from rock and soil samples, as well as measurements such as gravity and magnetism taken from a helicopter, but it also twinned historical records using machine learning tools to extract crucial information from old maps and geological reports, some of which can be millions of pages long.

    In some cases, KoBold forms partnerships with established mining companies, such as BHP, the world’s most valuable mining firm, in Australia, which provide their own data.

    KoBold utilizes this information to develop and train a set of analytical tools called “machine prospector.” While these tools don’t directly uncover metals, they can provide geologists with better guidance on where to search, or where not to search.

    One specific tool used by KoBold in Zambia helps identify mafic rock, which can mislead explorers into thinking they’ve found copper, thereby preventing costly failed drilling.

    Another tool, currently in use in northern Quebec where KoBold hopes to find nickel, copper, and cobalt, assists its research team in identifying the most promising rock outcroppings for sampling, expediting the search. “You can actually get through an area of ​​​​a couple hundred square kilometers in a season,” says David Freedman, a KoBold geologist who spent last summer traversing the tundra.

    How effective will machine learning be?

    Machine learning tools developed by KoBold and others have already simplified the lives of geologists; as Freedman points out, there’s no wind, rain, or mosquitoes when planning a prospecting route from behind a computer. Nevertheless, these methods are still in their early stages, and their potential to lead to major discoveries remains uncertain.

    Antoine Caté, a geologist and data scientist at SRK, an international consultancy, believes that machine learning models have the potential to “significantly enhance” success rates in exploration, partly due to their ability to detect patterns among datasets with more variables than the human brain can process.

    However, he warns that such tools are only as effective as the data fed into them: If an algorithm is built with poor data, it will be ineffective at best and could lead prospectors astray at worst.

    AI does not eliminate the need for human creativity. “These tools are exceptional for diagnostics,” Caté says. “But ultimately, you still need a skilled individual to interpret the information and draw conclusions from it.”

    KoBold’s Goldman shares this view. He emphasizes the importance of robust data, explaining that KoBold’s thorough investigative work reflects this need. Nevertheless, he acknowledges that it may take time for the company’s technology to deliver on its potential, and the extent to which it could accelerate the discovery of deposits is uncertain.

    Chan, whose firm has supported tech giants like Airbnb and Instagram, is optimistic about the future. She believes that the challenges faced by the mining industry in exploration and the urgency to find more battery metals make a software-driven approach long overdue. “If anyone can demonstrate they are more effective at selecting the right places to explore, that’s incredibly valuable.”

    Even if machine learning techniques prove successful, it may not be sufficient to avert future shortages. Better exploration is just one aspect of the equation: To achieve the two-degree goal of the Paris Agreement, Wood Mackenzie estimates that the mining industry will need to invest over $2 trillion in mine development over the next 15 years—a substantial increase from the approximately $500 billion committed in the previous 15 years.

    Scaling up will also require action from governments. Kettle points out that policymakers often stimulate demand for green technologies while simultaneously enacting regulations that make it more challenging to mine the materials needed to power them.

    In Zambia, embracing the green energy revolution is a national priority. The new government, elected in August, aims to revitalize an economy burdened by debt. Minerals, which make up three-quarters of exports, are crucial to this effort.

    Minister of Mines, Paul Chanda Kabuswe, believes that the potential “looming boom” in battery metals could bring immense benefits to Zambia. However, major deposits have not been discovered in decades. To ensure a stable supply in the long term, the mining industry will need to improve its methods.

    Humphrey Mbasela, a Zambian geologist assisting KoBold in analyzing the soil in Mushindamo District, believes that a big data approach will be beneficial. He thinks that explorers have been too focused on surface-level searches, while the most valuable resources may lie deeper.

    “After a day of collecting samples in the woods and fields, I can confidently say that the resources are there, hidden underground and waiting to be uncovered,” Mbasela explains.

  • Musk says robotaxis are key to Tesla’s future profits

    An autonomous Tesla being used for Uber collided with an SUV at a crossroads in suburban Las Vegas in April, sparking concerns about the safety of self-driving “robotaxis” operating in a regulatory gray area in US cities.

    Elon Musk, the CEO of Tesla, plans to unveil his vision for a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle designed for ride-hailing services, on October 10. He has long considered creating a Tesla-operated taxi network using autonomous vehicles owned by individuals .

    Despite its limitations, many ride-hail drivers utilizing Tesla’s Full Self-Driving (FSD) software, which costs $99 per month, find it beneficial as it reduces stress, allowing them to work longer hours and earn more money.

    Reuters was the first to report on the Las Vegas accident and the subsequent investigation by federal safety officials, as well as the widespread use of Tesla autonomous software among ride-hail drivers.

    While self-driving cabs with human backup drivers from companies like Alphabet’s Waymo and General Motors’ Cruise are heavily regulated, authorities state that Tesla drivers are solely responsible for their vehicles, regardless of whether they use driver-assist software. Unlike Waymo and Cruise, Tesla’s FSD is categorized as requiring driver oversight rather than being fully autonomous.

    The other driver involved in the April 10 Las Vegas accident, who was hospitalized, was found to be at fault for not yielding the right of way, according to the police report. The Tesla driver, Justin Yoon, claimed in a YouTube video that the Tesla software failed to decelerate his vehicle even after the SUV appeared from a blind spot caused by another vehicle.

    Yoon, known for his “Project Robotaxi” YouTube channel, was seated in the driver’s seat of his Tesla with his hands off the wheel when the incident occurred in a suburban area of ​​Las Vegas, as shown in the car’s footage. The Tesla on FSD was traveling at 46 mph (74 kph) and initially did not detect an SUV crossing the road in front of Yoon. Yoon took control at the last moment and steered the car to avoid a direct collision, as seen in the footage .

    “It’s not perfect, it’ll make mistakes, it will probably continue to make mistakes,” Yoon mentioned in a video following the crash. Both Yoon and his passenger sustained minor injuries, and the car was declared a total loss.

    Yoon had discussed using FSD with Reuters before publicly sharing videos of the accident but did not respond to requests for comment afterward.

    Tesla did not provide a comment in response to requests. Reuters was unable to reach the Uber passenger and the other driver for comment.

    Ride-hailing companies Uber and Lyft, when asked about FSD, emphasized that drivers are accountable for safety.

    Uber, in touch with the driver and passenger involved in the Las Vegas accident, referenced its community guidelines, stating that drivers are expected to maintain a safe environment for riders, even if their driving practices are within the legal bounds.

    Uber also highlighted Tesla’s instructions, which advise drivers using FSD to keep their hands on the wheel and be prepared to take control at any moment.

    Lyft stated, “Drivers agree that they will not engage in reckless behavior.”

    Musk has ambitious plans for the FSD product, envisioning it as the basis for the robotaxi software. He aims to establish a Tesla-operated autonomous ride service using customers’ vehicles when not in use.

    However, drivers speaking to Reuters also pointed out significant issues with the technology, such as sudden unexplained acceleration and braking. Some have chosen to stop using it in challenging scenarios like airport pickups, navigating parking lots, and construction zones.

    “I do use it, but I’m not completely comfortable with it,” said Sergio Avedian, a ride-hail driver in Los Angeles and a senior contributor on “The Rideshare Guy” YouTube channel, an online community of ride-hailing drivers with nearly 200,000 subscribers.

    Avedian avoids using FSD when carrying passengers. However, based on his conversations with fellow drivers on the channel, he estimates that 30% to 40% of Tesla ride-hail drivers across the US regularly use FSD.

    FSD falls under the federal government’s classification as a form of partial automation that necessitates the driver’s full engagement and attentiveness while the system handles steering, acceleration, and braking. It has attracted increased regulatory and legal attention following at least two fatal accidents involving the technology. However, utilizing it for ride-hail services is not prohibited by law.

    “Ride-share services permit the use of these partial automation systems in commercial environments, and this is something that should be subjected to significant scrutiny,” remarked Jake Foose, an analyst at Guidehouse Insights.

    The US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration acknowledged Yoon’s crash and had contacted Tesla for further details, but did not provide specific answers regarding additional regulations or guidelines.

    Authorities in California, Nevada, and Arizona, which oversee the operations of ride-hail and robotaxi companies, stated that they do not regulate the use of FSD and similar systems, as they fall outside the scope of robotaxi or AV regulation. They refrained from commenting on the crash.

    Uber recently updated its software to transmit passenger destination details to Tesla’s dashboard navigation system – a modification that benefits FSD users, according to Omar Qazi, a prominent user with 515,000 followers who posts under the handle @WholeMarsBlog and frequently receives public responses from Musk on the platform.

    “This will simplify Uber rides on FSD even more,” Qazi stated in a post.

    Industry experts noted that Tesla, Uber, and Lyft lack mechanisms to determine if a driver is both working for a ride-hailing company and using FSD.

    While almost all major automakers offer some form of partial automation technology, most are limited in their capabilities and approved for use solely on highways. In contrast, Tesla claims that FSD enables the vehicle to drive itself nearly anywhere with active driver supervision but minimal intervention.

    “I’m pleased that Tesla is implementing this and accomplishing it,” remarked David Kidd, a senior research scientist at the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. “However, from a safety perspective, it has raised numerous concerns.”

    Kidd suggested that instead of new regulations, NHTSA should consider issuing fundamental, nonbinding guidelines to prevent the misuse of such technologies.

    Missy Cummings, director of the George Mason University Autonomy and Robotics center and a former NHTSA advisor, emphasized that any federal oversight would necessitate a formal investigation into how ride-hail drivers utilize all driver-assistance technology, not just FSD.

    “If Uber and Lyft were wise, they would get ahead of this and prohibit it,” she remarked.

    Meanwhile, ride-hail drivers are expecting more from Tesla. Kaz Barnes, who has completed over 2,000 trips with passengers using FSD since 2022, expressed anticipation for the day when he could exit the car and let Musk’s network send it to work.

    “It would be like removing the training wheels,” Barnes stated. “I hope to be able to do that with this car one day.”

    Elon Musk Reveals Futuristic Details of the Tesla RoboTaxi

    Elon Musk envisions a revolutionary future for Tesla’s RoboTaxi. He sees a world where cars are completely transformed, no longer needing human intervention, steering wheels, or pedals. Musk emphasizes that the goal is not simply to improve existing automotive technology but to completely redefine it .

    Musk stated that they can easily create a car without steering wheels or pedals and can delete parts to accelerate the process if needed, highlighting Tesla’s commitment to designing vehicles for autonomy from the start.

    Musk describes the concept of a dedicated RoboTaxi as futuristic, reflecting advanced underlying technology. He mentioned that it would have a unique design unlike anything seen on the road today, embodying the technological leap that Tesla is making.

    Musk doesn’t just aim to create a single model but envisions a fleet of these vehicles, numbering in the millions, operating globally. He predicted that by next year, Tesla would have over a million cars on the road with full self-driving hardware He argues that this massive scale is essential not only for Tesla’s business model but also for transitioning the world to sustainable energy.

    Musk also sees this technological shift as a catalyst for broader societal change. He believes that the convenience and safety of autonomous vehicles will make them the preferred choice for consumers, ultimately leading to a world where human-driven cars are considered relics of a less safe era.

    Musk boldly claimed that in the future, consumers will want to outlaw people driving their own cars because it is unsafe. He believes that autonomous driving technology will become so advanced and reliable that the idea of ​​​​humans controlling vehicles will seem antiquated and Hazardous.

    Musk has made it clear that the technology and infrastructure to support this transformation are already in place. He stated that Tesla is uniquely positioned to lead this charge, with vehicle design and manufacturing, in-house computer hardware, in-house software development, and AI capabilities.

    In essence, Musk’s vision for Tesla’s RoboTaxi is about creating a new paradigm for transportation, one that is safer, more efficient, and fundamentally different from anything that has come before. He concluded that the impact of Tesla’s RoboTaxi could extend far beyond the automotive industry , shaping the future of how we move and live.

    Elon Musk’s vision for full autonomy in Tesla vehicles is based on his belief that artificial intelligence will be the key to unlocking a future where cars can navigate the world without human intervention. He believes that artificial intelligence will profoundly change the world. For Tesla, achieving full autonomy is not just about technological advancements but also about creating a comprehensive system that can learn, adapt, and ultimately drive more safely than any human could.

    Tesla’s approach to achieving full autonomy relies heavily on digital neural networks and cameras, rather than more traditional methods like LIDAR or radar. Musk explained that Tesla’s technology mirrors the way humans drive, relying on visual input to navigate the environment. He emphasized that humans are biological neural nets and use eyes to drive, while the analog for digital is cameras and digital neural nets, making the case that Tesla’s technology is a natural progression from how we’ve driven for over a century.

    Tesla faces a major challenge in achieving full autonomy, which involves ensuring that its vehicles can handle the complexities of real-world driving scenarios. According to Musk, the key to this is making the car “fully intelligent.” This goes beyond teaching the vehicle to follow traffic laws or recognize objects; it requires the ability to interpret and react to unpredictable situations, such as understanding the intentions of other drivers and pedestrians. Musk emphasized the sophistication required for true autonomy.

    Musk is confident in Tesla’s progress toward full autonomy. He believes that Tesla is “very close” to achieving a level of autonomy where the car could navigate from point A to point B without any human input. For instance, he mentioned that he is currently in Austin and the car could take him to the airport without any interventions, showcasing the current capabilities of Tesla’s AI-driven system.

    Nevertheless, the journey to full autonomy is not without challenges. Regulatory approval remains a significant barrier to the widespread deployment of fully autonomous vehicles. Musk acknowledges this but remains positive, stating that Tesla is working closely with regulators to ensure that its RoboTaxis can be legally and safely deployed.

    Musk shared that the company will have the first operating RoboTaxis next year with no one in them, although not in all jurisdictions due to the lack of regulatory approval everywhere. He expressed confidence that at least some regions will grant regulatory approval, indicating that while the technology is nearly ready, full deployment will require cooperation with global regulatory bodies.

    Ultimately, Musk envisions a future where Tesla’s autonomous vehicles are not only a technological marvel but also a ubiquitous part of everyday life, providing safer and more efficient transportation. The potential implications of this shift are significant, as it could dramatically reduce traffic accidents and transform how we perceive car ownership and mobility.

    Musk noted that the average use of a passenger vehicle is only about 10 hours per week out of 168 hours, suggesting that autonomous vehicles could operate for a far greater portion of the day, increasing their utility and efficiency.

    As Tesla moves closer to realizing full autonomy, the company continues to push the boundaries of what is possible in automotive technology. Musk emphasized the scale and ambition of Tesla’s quest to lead the world into a new era of autonomous driving.

    Economic and Social Impact

    The introduction of Tesla’s RoboTaxi fleet is set to bring about significant economic and social changes, reshaping industries and daily life. Elon Musk has frequently emphasized the transformative potential of autonomous vehicles, not just as a technological leap, but as a catalyst for broad societal shifts .

    Musk has declared that the company will achieve truly massive scale, surpassing any scale achieved in the history of humanity, underlining the ambitious scope of Tesla’s plans. The economic implications of this scale are extensive, with the potential to revolutionize the transportation sector and create new avenues for economic growth.

    One of the most immediate impacts of Tesla’s RoboTaxis could be on the cost of transportation. Musk has suggested that the widespread adoption of autonomous vehicles could significantly reduce the cost of travel, making it more accessible to a wider population.

    Musk has stated that it is financially illogical to buy anything other than a Tesla, highlighting the cost-efficiency of Tesla’s autonomous technology. By reducing the need for personal car ownership and making transportation as simple as summoning a RoboTaxi, Tesla could substantially lower household transportation expenses, freeing up income for other uses.

    Furthermore, the economic model Musk envisions for the RoboTaxi network could provide new income opportunities for individuals and businesses. Tesla owners will have the option to add their vehicles to the RoboTaxi fleet, earning money when they’re not using their cars.

    Musk explained that any customer will be able to add or remove their car to the Tesla Network, drawing a comparison to a blend of Uber and Airbnb. This could democratize access to income generation, transforming personal vehicles into revenue-generating assets.

    The broader economic impact of Tesla’s autonomous vehicles could also extend to the labor market. While the shift to autonomous driving will likely displace some jobs, particularly in the transportation sector, it could also create new opportunities in areas like vehicle maintenance, software development, and fleet management.

    Elon Musk has recognized the possibility of job displacement but contends that the overall advantages to society, such as improved safety and efficiency, outweigh the drawbacks. He has forecasted that consumers will eventually seek to prohibit human driving due to safety concerns, indicating that the society shift towards automation is unavoidable.

    On a societal level, the emergence of self-driving vehicles could result in significant alterations in urban planning and human interaction with their surroundings. With RoboTaxis decreasing the necessity for individual car ownership, urban areas might witness a reduction in the need for parking spaces, enabling the creation of more green spaces, pedestrian zones, and other community-driven developments.

    Moreover, the enhanced mobility provided by RoboTaxis could enhance transportation access for underserved communities, contributing to greater social fairness. Musk highlighted the potential for RoboTaxis to make transportation more efficient and widely accessible, noting that the usefulness of a passenger vehicle could increase substantial.

    By transitioning more vehicles to electric and autonomous operation, Tesla could aid in reducing carbon emissions and finally supporting global efforts to combat climate change. Musk has emphasized that this transition is necessary to move the world sustainable energy, positioning towards Tesla’s autonomous vehicle initiative as a crucial element of the broader drive towards sustainability.

    In summary, the economic and social implications of Tesla’s RoboTaxis are expected to be extensive and diverse. From reducing transportation expenses and creating new revenue streams to reshaping urban landscapes and advancing sustainability, the effects of this technology will be felt across numerous sectors and aspects of life. As Musk himself has stated, “This is gigantic,” and the world is only beginning to comprehend the full extent of the changes that Tesla’s autonomous vehicles will bring.

    Challenges and Doubts

    Despite Elon Musk’s ambitious vision for Tesla’s RoboTaxi fleet, substantial obstacles and skepticism persist. Tesla must surmount technical, regulatory, and societal hurdles on the path to full autonomy before its vision can materialize. Musk has acknowledged these challenges, remarking, “It turns out that in order to use this technology, the car has to really be quite fully intelligent.” Creating an autonomous vehicle capable of navigating the complexities of real-world driving is a considerable undertaking, and Musk himself has admitted that progress has been slower than initially expected.

    One of the main challenges facing Tesla is the technical intricacy of achieving full autonomy. While the company has made significant progress in developing its Full Self-Driving (FSD) software, there are still numerous exceptional scenarios in driving that the system must handle flawlessly. Musk explained that the vehicle must learn to interpret various situations and assess the intentions of drivers and pedestrians, emphasizing the need for the vehicle to possess situational awareness and decision-making capabilities comparable to or surpassing those of a human driver.
    Apart from the technical challenges, Tesla must also navigate a complex and frequently inconsistent regulatory environment. Laws governing autonomous driving vary widely between countries and even within different states or regions, creating a patchwork of regulations that Tesla must adhere to.

    Musk has expressed confidence that Tesla will soon receive regulatory approval for its RoboTaxis in certain jurisdictions, stating, “I’m confident we will have at least regulatory approval somewhere literally next year.” However, widespread approval is likely to take much longer, as regulators grapple with the ethical and safety implications of allowing fully autonomous vehicles on the road.

    There are also doubts about the timeline and feasibility of Tesla’s ambitious objectives. Musk’s previous predictions regarding the timeline for full autonomy have experienced delays, leading some industry experts and analysts to question whether the technology is as close to deployment as Musk suggests.

    The inherent unpredictability of software development, particularly in a complex field like autonomous driving, means that even minor setbacks can result in significant delays. Musk has stated, “I think we’re quite close to having the car be fully autonomous,” but there remains uncertainty about when this milestone will be achieved.

    Additionally, there is doubt about whether consumers will completely accept the concept of autonomous vehicles, especially in the initial phases of implementation. While Musk imagines a future where human driving is considered unsafe and outdated, convincing the public to have faith in and adopt this new technology will involve overcoming significant psychological barriers.

    The notion of giving up control to a machine, especially in a life-or-death situation like driving, is daunting for many individuals. Musk has recognized this challenge, likening it to the initial skepticism surrounding elevators: “Elevators used to be operated on a big lever… now you do not have elevator operators.”

    Tesla will need to manufacture vehicles at an unprecedented scale while ensuring that finally each car meets the strict requirements for full autonomy. This will necessitate not only substantial investment but also flawless execution in manufacturing, software development, and customer support.

    Musk has highlighted the extent of Tesla’s ambitions, stating frequently, “We’re going to move to just truly massive scale—scale that no company has ever achieved in the history of humanity.”

    In summary, while the vision of Tesla’s RoboTaxi fleet is unquestionably daring and potentially transformative, the path ahead is anything but easy. Technical challenges, regulatory obstacles, consumer skepticism, and the sheer scale of the endeavor all present significant hurdles that Tesla must overcome.

    However, as Musk himself has demonstrated time and again, he is undeterred by challenges, viewing them as part of the journey toward a revolutionary future.

    A Bold New Future

    Elon Musk’s vision for the Tesla RoboTaxi isn’t solely about transportation; it’s about redefining the very concept of mobility and questioning the established norms of how society perceives vehicles. As Musk sees it, the introduction of fully autonomous vehicles signifies a pivotal moment in human history—one that could fundamentally alter our cities, economies, and daily lives. “We’re going to move to just truly massive scale—scale that no company has ever achieved in the history of humanity,” Musk has said, emphasizing the magnitude of his aspirations.

    One of the most radical aspects of Musk’s vision is the notion that, in the future, owning a non-autonomous car will appear as outdated as operating a horse-drawn carriage. “In the future, consumers will want to outlaw people driving their own cars because it is unsafe,” Musk has predicted. This statement reflects his belief that once autonomous vehicles become the norm, human driving will be viewed as an unnecessary risk—a sentiment that could lead to significant cultural and legal shifts.

    Musk’s plans for the RoboTaxi network also suggest a broader transformation in how we think about car ownership and urban planning. By enabling vehicles to operate almost continuously, rather than sitting idle for most of the day, Tesla’s RoboTaxis could significantly reduce the number of cars needed on the road. “The average use of a passenger vehicle is only about 10 hours per week out of 168 hours,” Musk explained. With autonomous vehicles, he envisions that usage could increase significantly, leading to fewer cars on the road, less congestion , and more efficient use of urban space.

    This shift could have profound economic implications as well. Musk has frequently highlighted the financial advantages of a RoboTaxi system, both for Tesla and for individual owners. “The probable gross profit from a single RoboTaxi could be something on the order of $30,000 per year, ” Musk has estimated, suggesting that vehicle owners could generate significant income by sharing their cars on the network. For Tesla, this model represents a potential new revenue stream that could surpass traditional car sales, positioning the company at the forefront of a new era in mobility.

    Furthermore, the broader adoption of RoboTaxis could contribute significantly to Tesla’s overarching mission of accelerating the world’s transition to sustainable energy. By reducing the total number of vehicles required and optimizing their usage, the RoboTaxi network could lower global energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions.

    Musk’s vision of a fleet of electric, autonomous vehicles operating at scale is not just about convenience; it’s a critical component of his strategy to combat climate change. “Massive scale full self-driving has to happen in order to transition the world to sustainable energy ,” Musk has asserted, linking the success of the RoboTaxi network directly to his broader environmental goals.

    As Tesla continues to push the boundaries of what’s possible, Musk’s vision for the future of transportation remains both ambitious and thought-provoking. While challenges undoubtedly lie ahead, the potential rewards—both for Tesla and for society as a whole—are enormous. If Musk’s predictions hold true, the advent of RoboTaxis could mark the beginning of a bold new future, one where transportation is safer, more efficient, and more sustainable.

    Tesla is planning to unveil its anticipated highly robotaxi later this year. Here’s what we know so far about the “Cybercab.”

    Recently, Tesla CEO Elon Musk has shown a growing disinterest in the car business. He emphasizes that Tesla’s future depends on artificial intelligence and robotics rather than selling more Teslas. A key part of this vision centers around self-driving cars that can be used as “robotaxis” to completely eliminate the need for human drivers.

    A test prototype of what seems to be Tesla’s upcoming robotaxi was spotted by a Reddit user who claims to work at the Warner Bros. studio in Los Angeles. The photo below shows a heavily camouflaged two-door bright yellow prototype.

    The anticipated highly Robotaxi will be revealed on October 10. Sources have revealed that the unveiling will occur at the Warner Bros. Discovery movie studio in the Los Angeles area. The studio, situated in Burbank, is a historic film and television production set where iconic TV shows like Friends and films like Batman were filmed.

    However, Musk doesn’t want to rely on standard Model 3 sedans and Model Y SUVs for his Uber competitor. Tesla is working on a dedicated robotaxi vehicle, which Musk hinted may be named the “Cybercab” during a recent earnings call.

    This is an extremely ambitious plan, representing the ultimate extension of Tesla’s longstanding focus on its Autopilot and Full Self-Driving systems. However, it is also unproven and depends on aggressive development of new technologies, uncertain consumer support, non-existent regulations, and the ability of Autopilot and FSD to withstand legal challenges and even a federal criminal investigation.

    In other words, this is Musk’s biggest and riskiest move to date, and its success is far from certain. Nevertheless, let’s review what we know based on the company’s various statements and concept artwork that has been seen.

    What do we know about the Tesla Robotaxi?

    Musk has been talking for at least a decade about the imminent arrival of self-driving capability in Teslas. He has suggested over the years that autonomous Teslas could generate significant income for their owners by transporting passengers when they would otherwise be parked. However, none of this has materialized yet.

    In recent years, Tesla executives have also discussed the concept of a purpose-built Tesla robotaxi, designed from the ground up for autonomous driving rather than just being capable of autonomous driving on occasion.

    The robotaxi plan has taken precedence over more conventional, and arguably more sensible, projects at Tesla. In April, Reuters reported that Tesla had abandoned plans for an affordable mass-market vehicle, known informally as the Model 2, in favor of focusing entirely on the robotaxi. (Musk has suggested that this more affordable model is still in the pipeline, but it doesn’t appear to be a priority.)

    When will the Tesla Robotaxi be revealed?

    In April, Musk stated in a post on X that Tesla would showcase the robotaxi on August 8. However, in July, Bloomberg reported that Tesla intended to postpone the event until October. According to the report, Tesla’s teams required more time to develop additional robotaxi prototypes.

    During Tesla’s Q2 2024 earnings call, CEO Elon Musk announced that the Robotaxi’s reveal date would be October 10th. However, Tesla is known for its delays, so this date may change.

    When will the Tesla Robotaxi be released?

    So far, Tesla has not achieved autonomous fully driving in its current vehicles. It sells a feature marketed as “Full Self-Driving,” but this system requires driver supervision and is far from flawless.

    Before deploying robotaxis without steering wheels, Tesla would need to deliver reliable self-driving technology, and it is uncertain when or if this will happen.

    On Tuesday’s Q2 2024 earnings call, Musk stated in response to an investor question that Tesla would not be able to offer rides to customers until Full Self-Driving can be used without supervision. In its earnings report issued on Tuesday, Tesla stated that the ” timing of Robotaxi deployment depends on technological advancement and regulatory approval.”

    The fact that the robotaxi will be unveiled this summer does not necessarily mean that it is anywhere close to being ready for production. Tesla unveiled the Cybertruck pickup in late 2019, and the first trucks did not reach customers until a full five years later. design for an upcoming supercar, the Tesla Roadster, was revealed in 2017 and has still not been released.

    What will the appearance of the Tesla Robotaxi be?

    We are expecting to receive specific details about the vehicle’s design in August or possibly October. In the meantime, some strong hints have emerged.

    In 2022, Musk stated that the robotaxi will not have a steering wheel or pedals and described its design as “futuristic.” Musk’s biographer, Walter Isaacson, mentioned that an early design for the vehicle had a “Cybertruck futuristic feel.” This could suggest a more angular, polygonal aesthetic compared to the sleek Model 3 and Model Y.

    An illustration in Elon Musk’s book depicts a small, two-seat vehicle with a teardrop shape. In April, Musk referred to the robotaxi as the Cybercab. Although it’s uncertain if that will be the model’s actual name, it would make sense given the reportedly Cybertruck-like styling.

    In a recent video posted to X, Tesla appears to have released some additional hints. The clip shows what could potentially be the robotaxi’s front bumper and white interior.

    Previously, Tesla stated that it would construct the robotaxi using its lower-cost, next-generation vehicle platform. However, Tesla recently announced that it’s expediting new-vehicle projects by combining its current and next-generation technologies. It’s unclear which technology will form the basis of the robotaxi.

    How will Tesla’s Uber competitor function?

    During an April earnings call, Musk described Tesla’s taxi service as a blend of Airbnb and Uber. The concept is that Tesla’s fleet will include both its own robotaxis and the vehicles of Tesla owners who choose to participate – meaning you own the car and when you ‘re not using it, you can “rent” it out for robotaxi duty.

    This is something that Musk has promised in various forms for years. In 2019, he stated that up to a million Model 3s on US roads would be deployable as fully autonomous (SAE Level 5) robotaxis by 2020. As you might have noticed, that did not happen.

    Nevertheless, Tesla is clearly moving in that direction. In its earnings report, the automaker shared some representations of what a Tesla ride-hailing app might look like.

    How is Tesla’s Robotaxi different from Waymo, Cruise, and Zoox?

    Waymo and Cruise, autonomous taxi companies owned by Alphabet and General Motors, respectively, both utilize modified versions of off-the-shelf electric vehicles for their operations. Waymo uses Jaguar I-Paces, while Cruise uses Chevrolet Bolts.

    As they have developed their self-driving technology on public roads, both companies have utilized safety drivers who can monitor and take over if something goes awry. Cruise, which temporarily halted operations after striking a pedestrian late last year, is gradually reintroducing its vehicles with people in their drivers’ seats.

    Zoox, Amazon’s self-driving startup, is developing a taxi service that utilizes purpose-built, pod-like vehicles without steering wheels. However, it is still in the testing phase and has not yet launched commercial operations.

    Unlike any of those companies, Tesla asserts that it can achieve reliable self-driving capability using only cameras. Other autonomous-driving endeavors rely on more sensors, including LiDAR units that utilize lasers to create a three-dimensional image of the world. Many autonomous -vehicle experts question whether Tesla’s streamlined, vision-only approach will be successful.

    What obstacles are preventing this from moving forward?

    How much time do you have? First and foremost, the plan hinges on Tesla “solving” the issue of fully autonomous driving, something that many other experts have cautioned is decades away, not years, if it ever materializes. Additionally, Tesla has traditionally technologies for autonomy avoided that other automakers support, such as LIDAR. Instead, it’s attempting to train AI using cameras, sensors, and supercomputers.

    Moreover, the US is not equipped for a widespread robotaxi network of any kind. While robotaxi testing and pilot programs are underway in approximately 10 states, comprehensive federal regulations for them do not exist. There are unresolved issues of accident liability and other matters that must be addressed first.

    As we hinted at earlier, Tesla’s existing FSD and Autopilot technologies have been plagued by high-profile accidents, legal action, state investigations, and even a Department of Justice inquiry examining whether the automaker misled investors and consumers about the capabilities of its driver-assistance systems.

    So why does the Tesla Robotaxi matter?

    Tesla, its enthusiastic investors, and highly optimistic Wall Street analysts believe that autonomous driving will enable the automaker to generate substantial revenue over time. This is partly why Tesla is so valued.

    As of now, it is valued at $544 billion, approximately ten times the market caps of competitors like Ford and General Motors. A functional robotaxi will be crucial if Tesla wants to live up to the expectations set by its lofty stock price.

    What hardware features make a robotaxi, and what will Tesla do?

    Several companies have created or announced intentions to develop a custom-designed robotaxi. While this is fascinating, the design of the vehicle is only the third most crucial element for a robotaxi service. The first essential component is a reliable and safe self-driving software system, in addition to the sensor suite.

    The second crucial element is the infrastructure, which encompasses maps (or working with minimal maps), depots, storage, charging, cleaning, management, communications, customer service, remote assistance, a user app, crash management and insurance, maintenance, pricing model , and local regulator relations.

    Following these aspects, there is the physical vehicle, which is actually the most visible aspect of the service from a customer standpoint. Tesla has announced plans for a robotaxi and aims to unveil concepts for the physical form in October. Their initial goal was to do so in August, but they have postponed the release. There is currently no set timeline for when Tesla will have operational software, and they have shown minimal progress on infrastructure.

    Most companies have modified existing vehicles, at least for their initial projects. Some have designed custom vehicles with varying degrees of innovation. GM’s Cruise had a custom vehicle called the Origin, but it has recently put it on hold, at least for the time being . Waymo has been testing some of their relatively basic custom vehicles. Amazon’s Zoox has been focused on the custom vehicle from the beginning; it is their reason for existence.

    While most Chinese companies have made modest modifications to standard cars, Baidu Apollo has unveiled a $28,000 custom vehicle. There is a wide range of opinions on what a vehicle should look like now and in the future.
    Starting with a standard car provides significant economic advantages. Many companies are well-versed in manufacturing cars similar to those on the market today. It involves minimal risk. Additionally, companies can begin with much cheaper off-lease cars and resell them if they are not suitable or become too old for robotaxi service. Custom vehicles are tailored for life and entail a significant design risk.

    Waymo and others have typically acquired an existing model with minor modifications, such as places for mounting sensors and hardware. These vehicles come 90% complete from the factory, and the robotaxi company finishes the rest. Contract manufacturing of this nature is easy to arrange. Some modifications, such as redundant brakes and steering motors, and full drive-by-wire, may be specific to the robotaxi model.

    No steering wheel and pedals

    Early modified cars still retain these, and passengers are not allowed to sit in that seat. They are utilized by safety drivers testing the vehicles and rescue drivers recovering them. The first major step in creating a robotaxi is to take a standard car design and eliminate all the components used by drivers. This entails removing numerous items, not just the wheel and pedals. It also includes most of the elements on the dashboard, as well as mirrors, adjustable driving positions, and much more.

    In fact, the cost savings from the removed items may exceed the added expense of sensors and computing power! A seamless windshield is not even necessary, though front-facing passengers prefer it. Review the brochure for any modern high-quality car and peruse the complete list of features. Most of them are solely for the driver.

    Most of these models still allow an authorized individual to manually drive the car using a plug-in (or even wireless) set of controls, similar to a video game steering wheel. This enables them to be manually moved when necessary.

    Face-to-Face Seating

    When traveling in a social group, this provides a distinctly different experience (although it is less favorable for groups of strangers). A minority of individuals find rear-facing seats uncomfortable, but they can opt for the front-facing ones. Rear-facing seats are actually safer in a forward crash. Face-to-face seating may require slightly more space and could limit recline. Some vehicles may include front seats that rotate to offer a choice.

    Easy Entry

    All taxis aim to facilitate easy entry and exit. Taller designs (particularly with automatic sliding doors) are popular. The Origin and Zoox feature double side sliding doors into an open area. Some designs may even resemble public transit styles, with standing room and luggage placed on the floor. This can also provide better access for passengers with limited mobility. Additionally, it is possible to create custom roll-on robotaxis specifically designed for wheelchair users.

    Many options are being considered for this, but in reality, most passengers prefer using their own phone for these functions. However, specific controls such as climate adjustments, “stop ride,” and “new destination” must be easily accessible. There should also be a way to contact customer service directly without using your phone.

    In the future, there might be a larger screen available, primarily used to display content from the phone for those interested in watching videos. Unlike traditional cars, most robotaxis do not have a real dashboard, only a small touchscreen.

    The Back Is The Front

    This is the unique feature of Zoox vehicles—there is no distinct front or back. This allows the vehicle to easily change direction by reversing, which is advantageous in tight spaces, during passenger pickups, and when needing to turn around. The Origin model looks almost the same from both the front and back but not entirely. Legally, conventional “one-way” car designs could also drive in reverse if they have the appropriate lights, but it’s not ideal for extended periods as it may surprise other drivers.

    Privacy Dividers

    Current robotaxi plans involve transporting individuals in small groups. In a future scenario where rides are shared, robotaxis may have compartments with individual doors to provide privacy and security from other passengers. In larger vehicles, there might be 2-seat compartments on one side.

    Efficiency, or not

    Robotaxis designed for short urban trips do not need to achieve high speeds. Therefore, they do not require a highly aerodynamic design. This allows for taller designs with easier entry, and some may have boxy “trapezium” shapes. Robotaxis intended for highway travel need to be lower and have a more teardrop-shaped design to reduce costs and increase electric range.

    Sleeping

    In the future, robotaxis may offer the option for passengers to lie down and sleep. There might even be models dedicated solely to this purpose, which would be lower in height and more efficient. Being able to sleep during long commutes and overnight trips provides a seamless travel experience where the journey does not consume waking hours, which is highly beneficial.

    Half-Width or Two-Breast

    The majority of trips today involves a single person on short journeys, while most of the remaining trips involve two people. As a result, vehicles with half-width offer significantly lower construction and operating costs, require less parking space, and may even have the ability to split in certain areas. In the future, they may have access to special lanes. Some companies prefer a short 2-seater model, such as the Rimac.

    Cost

    For early robotaxis, cost is not a major consideration. In the initial years, with limited competition, fares will be higher. As the market develops and competition increases, cost will become a crucial factor, leading to the use of smaller, efficient vehicles aimed at delivering more value for the cost.

    Updatable Interior And Hardware

    Electric vehicles may have long lifespans, particularly if batteries can be replaced. Interiors will wear out over hundreds of thousands of miles of use. Therefore, they may be designed to be modular and easily replaceable and upgradable. similarly, hardware like computers and sensors may receive field upgrades due to the rapid pace of innovation in this field.

    A robotaxi must be easy to clean, ideally with automatic cleaning capabilities. Additionally, the ability for automatic charging is important. Since the vehicle is autonomous, the charging stations only need minimal robotics to use standard plugs. More innovative ideas could involve battery swapping for quick mid-day turnaround and a smaller battery pack, as well as an ice chamber to store cooling “energy” more cost-effectively than lithium batteries.

    Tesla?

    While Tesla has not made any official announcements, there has been speculation about a two-seater vehicle similar to the Verne, positioned side by side without a steering wheel, or a vehicle that can function as both a personal car and a robotaxi. To achieve the latter, it would need to have a fully or partially retractable wheel, as the wheel would be unnecessary during robotaxi operations, but essential for supervised driving outside the service area. (Even a car capable of driving on most roads still requires a limited service area as a robotaxi.) At present, it is unlikely that we will see anything like the Zoox or Zeekr.

    We’ve been hearing about Tesla’s Robotaxi concept for several years, and it seems that we may finally be approaching the realization of this vehicle. Here is all the information we have about the Robotaxi.

    Official Announcement

    Musk made an official announcement on X yesterday, revealing that the Tesla Robotaxi will be unveiled on August 8th, 2024. The last time Tesla unveiled a new vehicle was in November 2019 with the debut of the Cybertruck. Prior to that, the Roadster 2.0 and the Tesla Semi were unveiled at the same event in 2017, making these occasions quite special, occurring only once every few years.

    While there is a possibility that Tesla may need to change the Robotaxi’s unveiling date, it is exhilarating to consider that Tesla could be just four months away from revealing this next-generation vehicle.

    Robotaxis and Next-generation Vehicle

    Another detail about the Robotaxi emerged yesterday when Musk responded to a post by Sawyer Merritt. Sawyer mentioned that Tesla’s upcoming “$25k” vehicle and the Robotaxi would share the same platform, and that the Robotaxi would essentially be the same vehicle without a steering wheel . Musk replied to the post with a simple “looking” emoji.

    It’s not surprising that two of Tesla’s upcoming smaller vehicles will be based on the same platform, but it’s more intriguing that Musk chose to respond with that emoji when the post the Robotaxi being the “Model 2” without a steering wheel. This raises the possibility of Tesla not only unveiling the Robotaxi at the August 8th event but also its upcoming next-generation car.

    Production Timeline

    During Tesla’s Q1 2022 earnings call, Musk briefly discussed the timeline for Tesla’s Robotaxi, stating that they intend to announce the vehicle in 2023 and commence mass production in 2024.

    aiming for a 2023 unveiling, a late 2024 date now seems feasible for Tesla. However, it now appears that the Initially Robotaxi and the next-generation vehicle will share many similarities, suggesting that the production date for the Robotaxi could align with that of the next-generation vehicle, which is currently scheduled to begin in “late 2025”.

    The challenge in introducing an autonomous taxi, as the Robotaxi is intended to be, lies in the self-driving aspect. While Tesla has made significant progress with FSD v12, the first non-beta version, it remains a level-2 system that requires active driver supervision. Achieving a fully vehicle represents a substantial leap from where autonomous Tesla’s FSD currently stands, but as demonstrated by the transition from FSD v11 to v12, a lot can change in the next 18 to 24 months.

    While we anticipate Tesla’s continued focus on bringing its more affordable, next-generation vehicle to market ahead of potential competitors, the production date for the Robotaxi may continue to shift in line with Tesla’s progress on FSD.

    However, in April 2022, during the inauguration of Tesla’s new factory in Austin, Texas, Musk made waves by announcing that the company would be developing a dedicated Robotaxi vehicle that would have a “quite futuristic-looking” appearance.

    Diverse Range of Robotaxis

    As we move towards a world of “robotaxis,” it makes sense to continuously evolve the vehicle’s interior to cater to customer needs, such as incorporating face-to-face seating, large sliding doors for easy access, 4-wheel steering, and easier cleaning.

    Tesla could potentially offer a range of Robotaxis tailored to specific needs. For instance, a vehicle better suited for resting, allowing passengers to sleep during the journey.

    Another vehicle could resemble a home office, equipped with multiple monitors and accessories, enabling occupants to start working as soon as they enter the vehicle. Features like these could significantly enhance the quality of life for some individuals, giving them an extra hour or more in their day.

    The variety of Robotaxis doesn’t have to stop there. There could be other vehicles designed specifically for entertainment, such as watching a movie, or those that facilitate relaxation and socializing with friends, similar to what one would expect in a limousine.

    Lowest Cost Per Mile

    Elon Musk mentioned during Tesla’s Q1 2022 financial results call that the focus of its robotaxi would be on achieving the lowest cost per mile, and it would be highly optimized for autonomy. This confirms that the robotaxi will not come equipped with a steering wheel.

    Musk stated, “There are several other exciting innovations around it, but its primary optimization is to achieve the lowest fully considered cost per mile or km when factoring in everything.”

    Tesla acknowledged during the call that its vehicles are generally not affordable for many people due to their high cost. Musk sees the introduction of Robotaxis as a way to offer customers “the lowest cost-per-mile of transport they’ve ever experienced.”

    The CEO is confident that the cost per mile of the vehicle will be even cheaper than a subsidized bus ticket. If Tesla can entire accomplish this, it could significantly transform the automotive industry and redefine car ownership. The question arises: Is Tesla’s future still in selling vehicles or in providing a robotaxi service?

    FSD Sensor Suite

    Tesla has not disclosed any details about the sensor suite intended for the robotaxi. However, given their extensive work in vision and advancements in FSD, it is anticipated to be similar or identical to the current suite, possibly with additional cameras or faster processing.

    In 2022, Musk issued a caution: “With respect to full self-driving, of any technology development I’ve been involved in, I’ve never really seen more false dawns or where it seems like we’re going to break through, but we don’t, as I’ve seen in full self-driving. And ultimately what it comes down to is that to sell full self-driving, you actually have to solve real-world artificial intelligence, which nobody has solved.”

    Musk added, “The entire road system is designed for biological neural nets and eyes. Therefore, to solve driving, we have to solve neural nets and cameras to a degree of capability that is on par with, or really exceeds humans. And I think we will achieve that this year.”

    With the Robotaxi reveal approaching, it may not be long before we learn more about Tesla’s future plans and its truly autonomous vehicles.

  • Lucid or Tesla, which do you prefer?

    Lucid Motors, a startup based in California, has recently made a remarkable entrance into the EV market with its impressive and highly capable sedans.

    While the company has been in operation for many years, it only introduced its first consumer-ready vehicle in 2021. Although the company has primarily focused on sedans, it is set to launch an SUV, the Lucid Gravity, in the near future. Here’s an overview of the expanding EV company and a comparison with Tesla, the more established company led by Elon Musk.

    What is Lucid?

    Established in 2007, Lucid Motors began producing and selling its first (and currently only) model, the Air sedan, in late 2021, around the time when Tesla was still relatively young.

    The premium brand now offers multiple versions of the Air. The vehicles are manufactured at a factory in Arizona. Peter Rawlinson, Lucid’s CEO, previously held a senior engineering position at Tesla.

    About Lucid Group

    Lucid’s mission is to inspire the adoption of sustainable energy by creating advanced technologies and the most captivating luxury electric vehicles centered around the human experience. The company’s first car, the Air, is a state-of-the-art luxury sedan with a California- inspired design. Assembled at Lucid’s factories in Casa Grande, Arizona and King Abdullah Economic City (KAEC), Saudi Arabia, deliveries of Lucid Air are currently underway to customers in the US, Canada, Europe, and the Middle East.

    What is the price of a Lucid car compared to Tesla?

    Over time, Tesla has developed a range of vehicles, with prices varying from relatively affordable (such as the $39,000 Model 3 sedan) to quite expensive (like the nearly six-figure Model S Plaid, or around $121,000 for the Cybertruck Beast).

    Lucid primarily caters to the luxury market, with the entry-level Air Pure starting at $69,900. The pricing for the model extends up to $250,000 for the Air Sapphire, a high-performance luxury vehicle.

    As indicated by its pricing, Lucid prioritizes delivering substantial amounts of luxury, performance, and technology — and it certainly delivers. The $111,400 Air Grand Touring Performance, tested by Business Insider, was one of the most remarkable vehicles they had ever experienced.

    Externally, the long, low, and wide Air has a futuristic appearance that sets it apart from other vehicles on the road. The interior of the Lucid Air is equally stylish and distinctive, complementing the overall package. The vehicle they tested was adorned with supple leather and featured a vast windshield that extended beyond the driver’s head.

    Some Air models boast over 1,000 horsepower and exceptional performance. Additionally, Lucid offers the longest EV range on the market with the Air Grand Touring, which can travel 516 miles on a full battery charge.

    For years, Tesla led the market, but its flagship Model S sedan is no longer the electric car with the longest range, offering only 405 miles on a full charge.

    Tesla’s primary competitor to Lucid is its flagship Model S sedan, which also provides extensive range, impressive speed, and advanced technology at a high price — although not as high as Lucid’s top-of-the-line offering. Both vehicles provide some of the fastest charging available, although Tesla’s charging speed varies significantly based on the type of charging station used.

    Both brands eschew traditional buttons and switches in favor of touchscreen interfaces that control various functions, from air conditioning to door locks. Tesla’s interiors are minimalistic, while Lucid offers a more compelling interior and additional features, such as massaging seats.

    One drawback of Lucid Motors’ vehicles is that they cannot access Tesla’s extensive network of Supercharger stations, which Tesla owners benefit from.

    Neither brand operates franchised dealerships like traditional automakers. Instead, they own and operate their own showrooms and service centers. Customers have the option to order a vehicle online directly from the company, which will then be delivered to a showroom or service center. Depending on the location, it is also possible to have the vehicle delivered to a home or business address.

    Why The Lucid Air Is Better Than The Tesla Model S

    There was a time when the Tesla Model S was the sole choice for electric sedans, but the landscape has changed significantly. Today, there are numerous electric sedans available, offering different prices, power outputs, purposes, and all-electric ranges. also a time when the Model S led the way in terms of range and efficiency, but that is no longer the case.

    Many rival automakers have not only caught up with the technology that Tesla has worked hard to pioneer, but they are also beginning to surpass the California-based company in numerous ways, causing Tesla to lose ground in the sales battle.

    The Lucid Air currently reigns as the leader in the electric sedan market, as it provides more power and range and is also faster than the Model S. This alone is likely to pique the interest of most buyers, perhaps even why you are here. point is, however, that the Lucid Air offers much more than just superior power and range, and here are the main reasons why the Lucid Air outshines the Model S.

    On 29th October 2023, Lucid Air continues to present a strong challenge to the Tesla Model S. This electric vehicle offers competitive or even superior performance compared to the Model S, although at a slightly higher price. As the 2024 models for both Lucid Motors and Tesla is being introduced, the competition in the electric vehicle segment is intensifying.

    Many drivers perceive the Lucid Air as more sophisticated and traditionally luxurious than the Model S.

    A key reason why some people choose the Lucid Air luxury sedan over the Tesla Model S is its classic design and more conventional approach to luxury. The Lucid Air offers a timeless driving experience, in contrast to the Model S, which somewhat resembles the “fishbowl” ” ” design of the Model 3. However, some individuals prefer the rounded design and spaceship-like interior of Tesla, although for many luxury car buyers, the Lucid Air is more appealing.

    Historically, the Model S has been a sleek and sporty electric vehicle, featuring design elements not commonly found in luxury sedans. In contrast, the Lucid Air exudes charm and elegance, with numerous advanced features that outperform those of Tesla. While aesthetics are not the only consideration, they undoubtedly make a difference.

    The 2024 Lucid Air Sapphire model boasts 1,234 horsepower, a 118.0 kWh battery, and a 900-volt architecture.

    One of the most exciting announcements from Lucid Motors is the introduction of the 2024 Lucid Air Sapphire, an ultra-fast and luxurious sedan set to hit the market soon. The latest generation Lucid Air offers specifications such as 1,234 horsepower, a 118.0-kWh battery , and a 900-volt architecture, enabling it to recharge at rates of up to 300 kW at DC fast-charging stations.

    These details clearly outshine the current Model S, although Tesla has been reluctant to share any information about a next-generation redesign or update. In contrast, the media has been captivated by Lucid Air’s Sapphire model, which comes with a price tag of $250,000. Pricing a luxury sedan at such a high level is rare, positioning Lucid in a new realm within the global vehicle market.

    As of October 2023, customers can purchase a Lucid Air model for $77,400

    In October 2023, Lucid Motors is offering deals on the Air models, starting at $77,400 for the Lucid Air Pure RWD. Lease options begin at $749 per month, with an $8,069 initial payment. Although this may seem relatively high even for a lease, Lucid Motors is actively striving to attract more drivers to its vehicles, whether for the Air or any other model.

    Tesla has also reduced prices (more aggressively than Lucid Motors), with the Model 3 and Model Y receiving the greatest discounts. The Model S, being a higher-end option, has seen minimal changes in pricing, currently retailing for $74,990, excluding taxes and fees, which is still slightly lower than the Lucid Air. Once again, customers get more value for their money when purchasing through Lucid (for the time being), which is a justification for the higher-priced vehicle for many people.

    The 2024 Lucid Air model is available in 6 trim levels, with Canadian pricing ranging from $94,500 to $325,000 MSRP.

    The entry-level Pure model starts at $94,500 Canadian dollars and features an Electric: 321-kW motor & 88.00-kWh & Lithium Ion battery. The mid-range Pure Dual Motor trim is priced at $109,900 MSRP. The top-tier model, Sapphire , is priced at $325,000 Canadian dollars. Freight and PDI (Destination or Delivery charges) amount to $2,000 Canadian dollars, although this may vary between provinces and dealers.

    The Lucid Air is equipped with a 360-degree overhead camera system

    Similar to many luxury cars, the Lucid Air is equipped with a 360-degree camera system, providing drivers with a clear view of their surroundings while driving, parking, or even when inside the vehicle. This system operates similarly to Tesla’s camera technology, but with the Lucid Air, drivers get a more comprehensive view around their vehicle. The camera provides an ‘overhead’ view, displaying the car from a top-down perspective rather than showing all sides at once.

    Given the high price of the sedan, it is understandable for Lucid to develop this system, which is displayed on the driver’s infotainment screen. However, with Tesla actively working on a similar feature, it remains to be seen what will come next?.

    Tesla Model S achieves 0-60 MPH in 1.99 seconds, while Lucid Air achieves it in 1.89 seconds

    If you think back a few years, you can probably recall when the electric car making headlines was the Tesla Model S Plaid. This electric vehicle is essentially a speed demon on wheels. Today, we are witnessing a vehicle that can accelerate from 0 to 60 MPH in just 1.99 seconds and complete a quarter-mile sprint in about 9.23 seconds.

    Surprisingly, these are no longer the fastest production EV times, as the Lucid Air can accomplish the same in 1.89 seconds and 8.95 seconds, respectively. These are figures that used to be unheard of without significant modifications to an ICE engine, but now can be achieved by a combination of electric motors and advanced technologies.

    The flagship Lucid Air Sapphire is equipped with three electric motors and over delivers 1,200 horsepower

    The Lucid Air Sapphire, the top-tier model in the Air lineup, is powered by three electric motors that produce a combined 1,200 horsepower. In contrast, the Model S Plaid features the same tri-motor all-wheel-drive system but with an output of only 1,020 horsepower. According to the information we have from Lucid, the Sapphire can accelerate from 0 to 60 MPH in just 1.89 seconds, from 0 to 100 MPH in just 3.87 seconds, and reach a top speed of 205 MPH.

    On the other hand, the Model S Plaid takes 1.99 seconds to go from 0 to 60 MPH and can achieve a top speed of 200 MPH. The Air Sapphire also promises a quarter-mile time of under nine seconds, while the Plaid’s official quarter- mile time is 9.23 seconds with a 155-MPH trap speed. However, some enthusiasts have managed to achieve a time of just 8.94 seconds at 156 MPH.

    The Lucid Air is significantly lighter than conventional EV sedans, contributing to its performance

    One of the major challenges in the EV manufacturing industry has been the weight of the vehicles. The weight of the batteries needed to power an EV, as well as the motors that must be installed on each axle or tire for higher performance options, has been a significant concern. Lucid Air has revolutionized this by developing an all-new platform called the Lucid Electric Advanced Platform (LEAP).

    With this innovative approach, Lucid has created a smaller electric motor that weighs only 163 pounds, while offering more horsepower per motor than any others currently available on the market (up to 670 horsepower). To put this into perspective, according to reports from Lucid Motors, one of these electric motors could fit into a carry-on piece of luggage!

    Both the Lucid Air and the Model S utilize rapid-charging systems

    Advancements in battery technology have led to improved range for electric cars in a short period of time. In some parts of the world, including the United States, the transition to electric vehicles has been slower compared to other regions due to the disparity in range compared to a full tank of gasoline. When factoring in the time required to charge an EV versus refueling an ICE vehicle, there is a significant discrepancy.

    Fortunately, today’s innovative technology is enhancing the range and charging times, making the playing field more level. Lucid is one of the companies making significant strides in this area, now offering driving ranges of over 500 miles per charge. If Toyota succeeds in producing solid -state batteries with a range of over 900 miles and the ability to charge within 20 minutes, the shift to EVs will be more of a sprint than a leisurely walk.

    The Lucid Air offers a greater range than the Tesla Model S (520 miles versus 405 miles)

    There was a time when no one could match Tesla’s range, but those days are long gone as more manufacturers are pledging ranges of 400 – 500 miles, with Lucid Motors being one of them. Even in its base configuration, the Lucid Air promises more driving range than the Model S, so Tesla has lost significant ground in this segment.

    The Air Pure has a range of 410 miles, and the range only improves from there. The Touring model offers up to 425 miles, the Grand Touring up to 469 miles with 21-inch wheels, and 516 miles with 19-inch wheels. Dream Edition Range provides 481 miles of range with 21-inch wheels and 520 miles with 19-inch wheels.

    The Dream Edition Performance is rated at either 451 or 471 miles, depending on the wheels, while we are still awaiting the official figures for the Sapphire. As for the Model S, the range is 405 miles for the base model and 396 miles for the Model S Plaid.

    350 kW rapid charging can also be utilized with the Lucid Air

    In terms of charging speed, the Model S also falls short. While the Tesla Supercharger network is widely regarded as one of the best and most extensive in the world, it only provides charging speeds of up to 250 kW. Using one of the 45,000 Superchargers available in the United States, the Model S can gain up to 200 miles of range in just 15 minutes of charging, which is still quite impressive.

    However, the Lucid Air takes advantage of an ultra-high 900V+ electrical architecture and has access to an expanding 350kW fast-charging infrastructure being developed nationwide. The Air can achieve 20 miles of range for every minute of charging, making it the fastest-charging electric vehicle available.

    Upon purchase, Lucid Air models come with three years of fast charging at Electrify America Stations

    It goes without saying that the Lucid Air is not without its flaws and is far from being a perfect EV. This is why a solid warranty is essential. It enjoys a warranty identical to what Tesla offers: four-year/50,000-mile basic coverage and eight years/100,000 miles for the powertrain and battery.

    In fact, the Model S comes out on top in this aspect, as it includes an eight-year/150,000-mile warranty for the powertrain and battery. However, Lucid will provide Air owners with three years of free, fast charging at Electrify America stations, allowing for complimentary charging during this period.

    The Lucid Air offers superior driver assistance compared to nearly every other car on the market

    While Tesla has long boasted about its self-driving capabilities, they essentially consist of two optional functions that enable its models to operate on autopilot. On the other hand, the Lucid Air features Dream Drive – the most advanced driver assistance system in the world with autonomous driving capabilities that surpass those of Tesla.

    The latest version, called Dream Drive Pro, incorporates an extensive 32-sensor suite comprising 14 cameras, 1 lidar, 5 radar, and 12 ultrasonic units. Its software stack operates on the NVIDIA Drive platform, providing significant computing power for advanced features that enhance driver safety and aid in critical road decision-making. This feature is standard on Lucid Air Dream Edition and Lucid Air Grand Touring trims and is available as an option on all other Lucid models.

    The Lucid Air boasts a more sophisticated, timeless interior compared to the Model S

    With all the cutting-edge technology available in today’s market, every new car and SUV must incorporate as many modern features as possible without going overboard. Ensuring that the commute from home to the office, to the grocery store, and back home is as comfortable and enjoyable as possible, as well as turning those out-of-the-way drives into adventures rather than nightmares, is the ultimate goal.

    Both Tesla and Lucid are packed with state-of-the-art technology, and despite some complaints about the interiors of both not meeting expectations, both companies have significantly improved in recent years.

    The Model S has a somewhat uninspiring interior, mirroring the bland exterior. The most divisive feature is likely the steering yoke, which has garnered both praise and criticism. The sedan also features a 17-inch touchscreen that replaces all physical buttons, making simple commands more distracting while driving. Of course, this issue is prevalent in many cars these days, not just those from Tesla. The Air is no exception as it is equipped with a curved 34-inch Glass Cockpit panel that floats around the driver’s seat, providing easier access and visibility.

    A retractable central Pilot Panel also allows for deeper control of features. The rest of the cabin is characterized by high-quality craftsmanship and sustainability inspired by the natural landscapes of California.

    Customers have the option to select from high-quality Nappa leather or a sophisticated PurLuxe leather alternative, Alcantara, a sustainable alpaca and recycled yarn wool blend textile, or premium woods such as Silvered Eucalyptus, North American Walnut, or Carbon Oak.

    According to customer reviews, the Lucid Air has a more comfortable and spacious interior compared to the Model S

    The Model S can accommodate up to five people and offers synthetic leather upholstery, heated and ventilated front seats, and heated rear seats. While the front seats provide ample space and good support, the rear passengers may desire more legroom. Similarly, the Air can seat five adults, with the base model featuring synthetic leather upholstery and power-adjustable front seats.

    In contrast, higher trims of the Lucid Air come with genuine leather upholstery for the seats, which are also heated and ventilated as standard and offer optional massage functions. Unlike the Model S, the Air’s rear cabin provides generous space for three adults and offers the most legroom in its segment.

    The Lucid Air is considered a more elegant and stylish sedan compared to the Model S

    This four-door electric vehicle features a more sophisticated design, with the roof being its most distinctive feature. Tesla’s exterior design, which has been consistent across its models for years, has not seen significant improvements. This is one of the main reasons why the Model S feels outdated compared to the Air.

    The Air sports an exterior design inspired by aircraft, with clean and graceful lines. It is also one of the most aerodynamic cars globally, with a drag coefficient of 0.197.

    The Air also offers an optional Glass Canopy, which not only provides a beautiful view of the sky but also includes a protective interlayer to block out heat and sunlight. In early 2023, Lucid announced a Stealth Look exterior upgrade for the Air, which, for $6,000, modifies thirty-five external components of the car, giving it an even more distinctive appearance.

    Both the Lucid Air and the Model S boast a wide range of safety features and specifications

    The Lucid Dream Drive sets the Air apart from the Model S, with superior driver monitoring and detection. Safety is a crucial aspect of any vehicle, and both the Lucid Air and the Tesla Model S are equipped with some of the most advanced safety features available .

    Both vehicles include features such as backup assistance, cross-traffic alerts, self-driving modes, parking assistance, self-parking, lane-keeping assist, and more. What sets the Lucid Air apart is the Lucid Dream Drive, which offers some features that the Tesla does not. For instance, the Lucid Air is equipped with a lidar sensor (Light Detection and Ranging), a driver-monitoring system, and 32 different sensors.

    Tesla and Lucid Motors are recognized for producing some of the safest electric vehicles on the market

    Unfortunately, the NHTSA has not yet conducted comprehensive testing on either the Lucid Air or the Tesla Model S, preventing the release of crash test videos at this time. However, the Tesla Model S has achieved a 5-Star Euro NCAP Safety Rating twice since it entered production, a significant achievement.

    Most recently, in 2022, it received a 98% rating for driver assistance safety, 91% for child protection safety technology, and 94% for adult protection safety technology. On the other hand, the Lucid Air has not received as favorable ratings from the same organization, scoring 84% for driver assistance safety technology, 91% for child safety assistance technology, and 90% for adult safety technology assistance.

    Like their traditional internal combustion engine units, the Lucid Air and the Tesla Model S have a finite lifespan. While they are built to last as long as possible, it is important to understand that all moving parts eventually wear out and require repair or replacement, and these two electric vehicles are no exception.

    Reliability ratings for newer vehicles can be easily obtained by seeking input from current owners or consulting reputable sources such as Consumer Reports, which aggregates data from numerous owners.

    In this case, the predicted reliability of the 2023 Lucid Air is rated at 2/5, indicating that it has encountered issues with the electrical systems and the backup cameras. Similarly, the 2023 Tesla Model S has also received a 2/5 rating, with problems reported in the electrical system and front-facing camera angles.

    The Lucid Air offers a wider range of options compared to the Model S

    Although not all Lucid Air models are currently available for purchase, the company has announced plans for six trims: Pure, Touring, Grand Touring, Dream Edition Range, Dream Edition Performance, and Sapphire. In contrast, the Model S offers three trims: base , long-range, and plaid.

    With the exception of the Lucid Air Sapphire, all Air models are powered by two electric motors, providing power ranging from 480 horsepower and 443 pound-feet of torque in the Pure trim to 1,111 horsepower and 1,025 pound-feet of torque in the Dream Edition Performance.

    Lucid has also announced that the Air Pure will soon be available with a rear-wheel drive (RWD) configuration. For the Model S, the options are more straightforward: customers can choose between the dual motor setup with 670 horsepower or the tri-motor setup with 1,020 horsepower.

    The Lucid Air is designed with revolutionary battery and charging technology to make owning a sustainable vehicle more convenient and less complex

    Offering the longest range of any electric car currently available,¹ the Lucid Air provides the freedom to travel longer distances with confidence. During road trips, the Lucid Air minimizes charging stops with its advanced onboard technology, making it one of the fastest-charging vehicles on the market.

    For daily use, most Lucid owners prefer the convenience of charging their vehicles at home overnight. It’s akin to starting each day with a full tank of gas, without the hassle of stopping to refuel. Additionally, overnight home charging is more cost-effective and environmentally friendly, as it utilizes energy during off-peak times.²

    To ensure customers have the best charging experience, every new Lucid Air now comes with a $1,000 Charging Allowance ($1,300 CAD) that can be used towards the purchase of Lucid charging accessories, such as the Lucid Home Charger.

    Equipping your home with the leading charging technology from Lucid is possible with the Lucid Home Charger. This high-capacity 80 Amp/19.2 kW Lucid Connected Home Charger is the most powerful Level-2 home charger available, delivering up to 80 miles of range per hour in an eco-friendly manner. Its compact design and generous 24-foot cable make it easy to install and use indoors or outdoors. With Wi-Fi connectivity, the Lucid Connected Home Charging Station is designed to receive future updates to enhance performance and functionality.

    Lucid is launching its first-ever Sustainability Report

    Today, Lucid Group is releasing our inaugural Sustainability Report, outlining our commitment to accelerating the adoption of efficient, decarbonized technology for a sustainable future.

    Sustainability is at the core of Lucid Group as an electric vehicle (EV) manufacturer and technology company. It’s integral to our purpose and products, as we have a crucial role in shaping a more innovative, environmentally sustainable, and socially responsible future.

    The Need for Efficiency

    According to the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the transportation sector is the largest emitter of greenhouse gases in the US Achieving a more environmentally sustainable future requires reducing emissions in the transportation sector through accelerated adoption of green technologies and improved efficiency.

    Efficiency involves using fewer materials and less energy to achieve more. It means providing drivers with the range they need to travel further and recharge less, addressing “range anxiety” and reducing the reliance on energy resources like fossil fuels, which are heavily used by much of our grid. Efficiency enables us to accomplish this using fewer batteries and precious minerals in the process.

    Not All EVs Are Alike

    While all EVs offer the advantage of zero tailpipe emissions, their overall environmental impact can vary significantly. Numerous factors influence this, primarily due to the wide-ranging differences in energy efficiency among EVs. The less electricity an EV consumes to drive each mile, the fewer carbon emissions are associated with each mile traveled.

    Lucid dedication to efficiency is evident in the EPA’s widely utilized miles per gallon equivalent (MPGe) rating, with the Lucid Air Pure achieving a rating of up to 137 MPGe in combined city and highway driving. This is the highest rating in the EPA’s Large Car category and the second-highest rating among any 2024 model-year vehicle as of the present.³

    Through Lucid focus on efficiency, different versions of the Lucid Air have managed to achieve the longest range (up to 500 miles on a single charge⁴) and one of the fastest-charging EVs (up to 20 miles added per minute⁵) with the highest efficiency measured in miles/kilowatt-hour (4.74 miles per kilowatt hour).

    Lucid commitment to efficiency also influences our battery approach. Lucid use fewer batteries and battery materials to maintain the safety, quality, and driving experience expected by Lucid’s customers. In contrast to prevailing trends in the market, where larger vehicles often require larger battery packs to achieve even a fraction of the Lucid Air’s range, Lucid focus on efficiency allows us to achieve impressive range with a smaller battery pack.

    Social Responsibility, Community Impact, and Human Rights

    As an EV company, Lucid naturally places a strong emphasis on the environment. However, Lucid believe that sustainability and social responsibility extend far beyond our efforts towards a lower emissions future.

    Lucid Air is a strong program for nurturing talent to support and promote the growth of our workforce. Lucid Air places a focus on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) across its global locations through training and initiatives such as employee resource developing groups (ERGs) ).

    Lucid Air is dedicated to giving back to local communities through various activities, fundraising efforts, and volunteer opportunities that promote STEAM and DEI initiatives. Lucid Air proudly partners with the United Way of Pinal County in Arizona, supporting programs like GED scholarships, rental and utility aid, and childcare assistance, having raised over $130,000 in 2022 for this important cause.

    In addition, Lucid Air is committed to safeguarding human rights and is working to identify, prevent, mitigate, and address adverse human rights impacts throughout its operations and broader value chain, including those of its suppliers and business partners. In line with these efforts, Lucid Air has initiated the development of a comprehensive human rights program to address potential human rights risks in its operations, an initiative that spans across all aspects of Lucid Air’s global business operations.

    The Path Ahead

    Lucid Group possesses the technical expertise, innovative design, and pioneering mindset to create impactful products with reduced environmental impact.

    Lucid Air believes that true sustainability means never compromising when it comes to its environmental and social impact and is in the early stages of establishing a comprehensive approach in this area. As a relatively young company, Lucid is focusing on collecting data and setting a baseline on key sustainability focus areas.

    Today, Lucid unveiled a range of updates to the Lucid Air Pure model line, all aimed at enhancing the capabilities and enjoyment of the world’s best electric vehicles.

    One of the most exciting updates is that the new Lucid Air Pure offers an EPA-estimated range of 420 miles from a battery pack that is only 84 kilowatt-hours. Enabled by further advancements of Lucid’s groundbreaking technology, this makes the Lucid Air the first vehicle in the world to achieve a ratio of 5.0 miles of range per kilowatt hour (kWh) of energy. It has also earned the highest MPGe (miles per gallon equivalent) rating ever given to an EV with 146 MPGe from the EPA.

    With the advancements driven by Lucid, the Lucid Air Pure is the most energy-efficient and sustainably-powered vehicle ever made. Whatever journey you are embarking upon, the Air Pure effectively requires less energy to go from point A to point B than anything else available today. It is a major milestone in the global effort for sustainable electric transportation.

    To put this in some context, the new Lucid Air Pure is not only vastly more fuel-efficient than popular gasoline-powered vehicles like the Honda Civic and the Toyota Prius Hybrid, it is even significantly more efficient than other fully electric vehicles.

    The batteries used in electric vehicles are better than ever, but they remain large, heavy, and costly. The larger the battery pack in a vehicle, the bigger, heavier, and more expensive it will be. Indeed, this is why so many automakers have struggled to introduce appealing EVs.

    Efficiency is the key to electric vehicles without such compromises. Efficiency is what makes it possible to design electric vehicles that deliver the range that consumers expect without relying on an enormous battery pack and thus sacrificing affordability, passenger space, and a fun driving experience.

    How efficient an electric vehicle is when driving on the road also drives critical differences in how much time is spent off the road for charging. While much attention is paid – rightly – to public charging infrastructure, the fact remains that roughly 90% of EV charging is done at home, with Level 2 (AC) charging systems that deliver the same power regardless of what kind of EV is plugged in.

    This means that, when plugged in overnight, most EVs will receive roughly the same amount of energy. But how far an EV can travel with that energy is another matter entirely.

    When plugged in for 10 hours at home, the new Lucid Air Pure can add 380 miles of driving range, charging the vehicle from 0% to 90%. Over the same 10-hour period, a Tesla Model S would only reach 76%, for a total of 306 miles. Plugged in overnight, a Rivian R1S SUV would be only 51% charged, with just 204 miles of range available from its large battery pack.

    Increasing efficiency also makes it possible to manufacture more cars with a given amount of raw materials, helping mitigate the environmental impact of manufacturing. Lucid recently announced that its first sustainability report will be published this year and looks forward to sharing more on this topic as well .

    Lucid is proud of this recent achievement, but acknowledges that the work must continue to make EVs even more appealing and accessible to consumers around the world. While achieving 5 miles per kilowatt-hour is a significant milestone, the focus must continue on striving towards a future with even more efficient transportation, cleaner air, and a sustainable environment.

    Rumors of a Saudi Buyout

    Reports have recently suggested that Lucid Motors, an electric vehicle (EV) manufacturer based in California, might be subject to a significant acquisition. The speculation indicates that the Public Investment Fund (PIF), an investment firm controlled by the government of Saudi Arabia, is contemplating the purchase of Lucid Motors. In this article, we’ll delve into these speculations and consider the potential implications of a Saudi acquisition of Lucid Motors for the company’s future and the EV industry.

    Lucid Motors is emerging as a prominent contender in the electric vehicle market despite being a relatively new participant, gaining recognition for its innovative designs and state-of-the-art technology. The company’s debut vehicle, the Lucid Air, is scheduled for release later this year and has already garnered substantial attention due to its advanced features, high-end luxury, and exceptional performance.

    The speculation about a Saudi acquisition of Lucid Motors originates from the country’s recent ventures in the electric vehicle market. Saudi Arabia has been actively striving to reduce its reliance on oil and invest in alternative energy, including electric vehicles. The PIF has already made investments in various EV companies, including Tesla, and is rumored to be seeking further opportunities in the sector.

    If the speculations regarding a Saudi acquisition of Lucid Motors are accurate, it could entail a substantial infusion of capital for the company. This would enable Lucid Motors to expand its operations, enhance its production capacities, and continue advancing its cutting-edge technology. could also facilitate the company in realizing its objective of establishing a significant presence in the premium EV market.

    Nevertheless, a buyout by the Saudi government could raise certain apprehensions, particularly concerning the aspects of autonomy and authority. Some individuals may express concerns that the acquisition of Lucid Motors by a government-owned investment firm could compromise the company’s independence and restrict its ability to make decisions aligned with its values ​​and objectives.

    At present, the speculations about a Saudi acquisition of Lucid Motors are merely speculative. However, if the reports are substantiated, it could have a notable impact on the company’s future and the electric vehicle market. Lucid Motors has the potential to emerge as a prominent contender in the premium EV market, and a buyout by the Saudi government could equip the company with the necessary resources to accomplish its aspirations. The future of Lucid Motors remains to be seen, but for now, it’s certainly prudent to keep a close watch on the speculations about a Saudi acquisition.

  • Tesla’s cheapest Model 3 is no longer available

    Tesla has ceased sales of the most affordable version of the Model 3 sedan in the US. An analyst referred to it as a wise strategic move.

    Tesla quietly stopped selling the Standard Range Rear-Wheel Drive Model 3 in the US. This move was praised by a bullish analyst speaking to Business Insider. The electric carmaker, run by Elon Musk, removed this version from its website as of Wednesday, as reported by Reuters.

    The cheapest Tesla car in the US is now the Model 3 Long Range Rear-Wheel Drive, priced at $42,490. The discontinued model utilized lithium iron phosphate battery cells sourced from China, according to Reuters. Earlier this year, the US imposed tariffs on EVs imported from China, as well as on EV batteries and key minerals.

    Vehicles using Chinese-made components, such as the LFP batteries, are no longer eligible for the $7,500 federal tax credit. Dan Ives, an analyst at Wedbush and a long-time Tesla supporter, told Business Insider that discontinuing the model is “a smart strategic move” indicating a greater focus on the Long Range Model 3. Ives also noted that the tariffs on Chinese EVs reflect substantial tension in the US-China Cold Tech War, which benefits Tesla.

    He added that removing the Standard Range model does not significantly impact Tesla’s overall strategy, as the Model Y remains the company’s primary focus in the US EV market. The starting price for the Model Y is $44,990. Affordability has become a major concern for electric carmakers , as most EV options, including Tesla’s, are still more expensive than the average gas-powered car. Tesla has previously discussed plans to manufacture a cheaper car than the Model 3, but has not yet done so.

    Tesla’s decision to discontinue the cheapest version of the Model 3 came shortly after the company slightly exceeded analysts’ delivery expectations, with third-quarter sales reaching 462,890 vehicles. Ives told BI that Tesla’s sales were “a step in the right direction” to meet its yearly target of 1.8 million vehicle deliveries. Bargain Chinese EVs Adding to the price war are Chinese competitors like Xpeng, which recently introduced the Mona M03 at $16,800 — less than half the price of Tesla’s Model 3 in China.

    Nio and BYD are planning to launch a new, affordable brand called Onvo, which would directly compete with Tesla’s Model Y. Nio also has plans to launch a second EV brand named Firefly, which would retail for under $30,000, as reported by Reuters in May Chinese government policies, including scrapping and replacement subsidies, continue to fuel demand for more affordable EVs in the country, according to a September note from HSBC analysts.

    The bank anticipates that over 100 new models will be launched in China by the end of 2024, primarily by the country’s EV brands. Tesla did not respond to a request for comment sent by BI outside business hours.

    Tesla is no longer offering the sub-$40,000 rear-wheel drive Standard Range version of the Model 3 that has been in the company’s lineup since 2023. The most affordable trim is now the Model 3 RWD Long Range that starts at $42,490. This change was initially highlighted by Electrek and coincides with Tesla’s announcement of a year-over-year increase in vehicle deliveries in its third quarter of 2024.

    Tesla has adjusted prices numerous times over the past few years as it strives to maintain its leading position in the market. However, an increasing number of customers have turned to other vehicle brands, resulting in year-over-year sales declines for Elon Musk’s company .

    Tesla also discontinues certain trims occasionally, often without prior notice or fanfare. Earlier this year, the company ceased offering the $60,990 RWD Cybertruck, the cheapest version of its angular EV truck.

    The Model 3 Standard Range, which claimed a 272-mile range on a full charge, utilized more affordable lithium iron phosphate (LFP) cells produced in China. These cells are likely to become more expensive to import due to the Biden administration’s decision to raise tariffs on Chinese batteries, semiconductors, and critical minerals. Before incentives, it was the only model that came close to the short-lived and long-promised $35,000 Model 3.

    Tesla’s RWD Long Range costs $3,500 more than the discontinued Standard Range. This price difference isn’t substantial considering that the Long Range model is estimated to have a 363-mile range on a full charge, although Tesla has faced accusations of inflating its range estimates .

    Despite the Model 3 Standard Range no longer being available for order, Tesla is still working on a more affordable, yet-to-be-announced vehicle for the second half of 2025, which could either be a new car or a more basic version of the Model 3.

    Tesla’s ability to make its vehicles more affordable by simplifying them further is uncertain, especially considering that a more basic version of the Model 3 in Mexico turned out to be more expensive than US models, even though the newer models already lack drive and turn signal stalks .

    The production and delivery report for Tesla’s third quarter has been released.

    After two consecutive quarters of decline, Tesla’s vehicle sales are finally increasing.

    During the three-month period ending in September, Tesla produced 469,796 vehicles, marking a 9.1 percent increase compared to the third quarter of 2023. Additionally, the company delivered 462,890 vehicles to customers in Q3 of 2024, representing a 6.3 percent increase from Q2 2023 .

    These figures show improvement over the previous quarter, with production up 14.4 percent compared to the second quarter of 2024 and delivery up 5.8 percent. Tesla is producing and selling more vehicles than earlier this year.

    While the Cybertruck may be contributing to this growth, Tesla does not provide specific numbers for this electric truck. The majority of its production and delivery consists of Model 3 and Y vehicles, with 443,668 produced and 439,975 delivered in Q3. Other models, including Model S, X, Cybertruck, and Tesla Semi, fall under the “other models” category.

    However, Tesla faces challenges as overall electric vehicle (EV) sales are growing slower than in previous years, with customers showing more interest in hybrids rather than pure battery-electric vehicles. As Tesla exclusively produces battery electrics, it may be at a disadvantage compared to traditional automakers with more diverse lineups.

    The company also faces increased competition, both in the US and in China, where companies such as BYD and Geely are achieving record EV sales. Tesla’s regional sales numbers are not disclosed, making it difficult to pinpoint its specific strengths and weaknesses.

    Tesla’s full third quarter earnings will be reported on October 23rd. Before that, on October 10th, the company is expected to unveil its long-awaited “robotaxi,” with CEO Elon Musk making a strong pitch for Tesla’s future as an AI and robotics company .

    Tesla, founded in 2003 and named after inventor Nikola Tesla, gained prominence after Elon Musk joined the company a year later. Musk invested $30 million in Tesla, became the chairman of its Board of Directors, and later secured funding from Google’s founders.

    The prototype for Tesla’s first electric car, the Roadster, was revealed in 2006 and went into production in 2008. By June 2009, 500 Roadsters had been sold at a price of $98,000 each.

    In 2017, Tesla entered the mainstream market with the launch of its Model 3, which became the world’s most popular plug-in electric car in 2020, with approximately 501,000 unit sales in 2021. Between January and March 2022, Tesla set a new delivery record , surpassing 310,000 units.

    Tesla’s shares surged by over 7% on Tuesday, July 2, following the release of its latest quarterly delivery numbers, which exceeded consensus expectations. In the second quarter, Tesla produced around 410,831 vehicles and delivered approximately 443,956 vehicles, surpassing the analyst consensus of 439,302 deliveries. The quarter saw Tesla produce 386,576 Model 3/Y vehicles, with 422,405 deliveries. Tesla’s shares reached a high of $226.66 following this news.

    Thomas Monteiro, a senior analyst at Investing.com, remarked, “The better-than-expected Q2 deliveries are not only a breath of fresh air for Tesla’s margins but also for the EV market as a whole. Although these numbers were naturally boosted by strong auto demand in the US in general—GM’s sales, released shortly before, further attest to this—it indicates that the EV market is still alive, as several analysts were quick to point out a few months ago.

    “However, deliveries only offered limited support to the ongoing rally. The real focus for investors is on the technology front, with both the humanoid robot and the Robotaxi stories developing at an exciting pace. Both, particularly when combined, have the potential to become absolute game-changers for the company’s margins, meeting the expectations of Tesla shareholders.”

    What Is Tesla’s Annual Revenue?

    Tesla’s annual revenue in 2021 was $53.8 billion, marking a 70.64% increase from 2020 when it earned $31.5 billion in sales. In 2022, Tesla maintained its position as the leading EV manufacturer by revenue and market share, surpassing Volkswagen.

    During Q1 2022, Tesla sold over 310,000 vehicles, and its vehicle deliveries totaled 254,700 units in Q2 2022. For the quarter ending June 30, 2022, Tesla’s revenue was $16.934 billion, showing a 41.61% year-over-year increase. The revenue for the months ending June 30, 2022, was $67.166 billion, reflecting a 60.45% growth year-over-year.

    In the third quarter of 2022, Tesla’s revenue was $21.454 billion, and in the fourth quarter, it reached $24.32 billion, representing a 37.24% year-over-year increase. The revenue for the twelve months ending December 31, 2022, was $81.462 billion , indicating a 51.35% growth year-over-year. In 2022, Tesla’s hourly revenue was $8,703,704, compared to $13,981 per hour in 2012.

    In the second quarter of 2024, Tesla reported earnings with EPS of $0.52, falling short of the analyst estimate of $0.61. The revenue for the quarter was $25.5 billion, surpassing the consensus estimate of $24.33 billion.

    In 2022, Tesla achieved remarkable delivery statistics, with the company delivering 1,313,851 vehicles globally, marking a 40% increase from the previous year. It also increased its car production by 47% compared to 2021.

    Tesla’s sales in the US outperformed other luxury car brands, with 491,000 vehicles sold in 2022, securing its position as the leading luxury car sales leader. The company also made significant contributions to American car manufacturing by producing its cars in California and Texas under Elon Musk’s leadership.

    During 2022, Tesla expanded its international factories, commencing vehicle production at Giga Berlin in Germany and updating the factory in China to manufacture up to 750,000 Model 3 and Model Y electric cars additionally annually., Tesla enhanced its production capacity across all its factories to produce 100,000 Model S and X vehicles per year, along with 1.8 million Model Y and Model 3 vehicles.

    In late 2022, Tesla reduced the prices of its vehicles globally, making its Model 3 and Model Y cars more affordable in several countries. This move aimed to accelerate the world’s transition to sustainable energy by enabling more people to purchase Tesla’s cars.

    How Many Tesla Vehicles Are Sold Each Year?

    Tesla has been increasing its annual production steadily. In 2014, the company manufactured only 35,000 vehicles. In the first half of 2021, Tesla produced 386,759 cars, with 184,877 vehicles delivered in Q1 and 201,304 in Q2. Overall, in 2021, Tesla manufactured 930,422 EVs and delivered 936,222, setting a new record. These numbers indicate a year-over-year growth of 82.5% compared to 2020.

    There were 906,032 Model 3/Y vehicles produced, representing a 99% increase from 2020. In the same year, Tesla manufactured 24,390 Model S/X cars, showing a 56% decrease year-over-year. The deliveries of the latter model also decreased by 56% compared to 2020, amounting to 24,980 vehicles. Deliveries of the Tesla Model 3/Y reached 911,242, marking a 106% increase from 2020.

    In the first and second quarters of this year, Tesla produced 564,750 vehicles. Analysts anticipate that Tesla’s rapid growth may accelerate in the third quarter and beyond. During the annual shareholder meeting, Elon Musk discussed the company’s future production plans, that stating by the end of 2022, Tesla might achieve an annual production run rate of 2 million vehicles:

    “We’re aiming to achieve a 2 million vehicle run-rate by the end of the year… Thanks to the hard work of the Tesla team, we’ve already been able to achieve a 1.5 million unit annualized run rate. And depending on how the rest of this year goes, I think we might get close to, or will get approximately at the 1.5 million mark, and will be exiting the year at a 2 million-unit run-rate,” Musk said.

    In the fourth quarter of 2022, Tesla delivered nearly 405,300 units. Its quarterly deliveries grew by 17.87% during this quarter, compared to the same quarter of 2021. Between November and December 2022, Tesla’s deliveries crossed the 405,000 unit mark, setting a new record The deliveries in the third quarter of 2022 totaled 343,000. Overall, in 2022, Tesla delivered 1,313,851 and produced 1,369,611 units. Since 2018, Tesla has delivered 3,382,821 and has produced 3,429,532 cars.

    The company also stated that the factory in Shanghai enables it to manufacture 750,000 Model 3 and Model Y electric vehicles a year. The production capacity of Tesla’s factory in California allows it to annually produce 100,000 more expensive Model S and Model X cars, along with 550,000 of its Model 3 and Model Y vehicles. The company’s Texas factory can produce 250,000 Model Y vehicles annually, and so can its factory in Germany.

    Tesla’s 2022 Year-End Vehicle Production and Delivery

    Tesla began the new year by releasing its fourth-quarter vehicle production and 2022 delivery report on January 3, 2023. Total annual deliveries reached a new record of 1.31 million, increasing by 47% compared to the previous year. Total annual production reached 1.37 million . The most popular vehicle of the year proved to be the Model 3, comprising over 95% of produced and delivered cars.

    The Q4 deliveries and production could have been more remarkable. Their numbers fell short of analysts’ consensus, who expected Tesla to deliver around 427,000 cars. Contrary to analysts’ predictions, Tesla delivered 405,278 vehicles and produced 439,000 cars in the fourth quarter.

    The period ending December 31, 2022, was challenging for the company due to Covid outbreaks in China, leading to reduced production at its Shanghai factory. Yet Elon Musk sounded optimistic when he expressed his anticipation to achieve “50% average annual growth in vehicle deliveries over a multi-year horizon.”

    How Many Tesla Vehicles Are Sold by Country?

    Tesla sold and delivered the majority of its vehicles in China in 2021. Of these electric cars, 478,078 were made in Tesla’s production facility, Gigafactory Shanghai. From its American facilities, Gigafactory Texas and Gigafactory California, Tesla sold 301,998 vehicles.

    The company is gaining popularity in Europe. In 2021, it sold 169,507 vehicles in European countries, where the Tesla Model 3 was named Europe’s favorite electric vehicle. In 2019, the Netherlands purchased the largest number of Tesla cars among European countries – 30,911 vehicles. Norway and Germany followed the Netherlands’ example with 18,798 and 10,711 cars purchased respectively.

    In the United States, Tesla was the first manufacturer to reach 200,000 cumulative sales of electric vehicles, reaching the end of its government subsidy cap of $7,500 per sold car. In other words, since January 2020, no Tesla vehicle sold in the USA has received any subsidy.

    Tesla began producing its vehicles in China in 2018. In January 2020, Tesla’s Chinese Gigafactory launched the output of the Tesla Model 3 Sedan and batteries. The production of the Tesla Model Y began on the Chinese mainland in 2021

    How Many Tesla Charging Stations Exist?

    As of the start of 2022, there were a total of 3,724 Tesla Supercharger stations worldwide. These charging stations are strategically placed in urban and rural areas to allow Tesla owners to recharge their vehicles in just fifteen minutes. In response to increased sales, Tesla has Made significant efforts to expand the availability of charging stations. Between July 2018 and July 2021, Tesla added 1,652 new Supercharger stations.

    By the end of 2021, Tesla was operating 3,059 Supercharger stations in more than forty countries. The number of charging stations for Tesla electric vehicles grew by 86.07% from July 2019 to July 2021.

    In October 2021, the majority of Tesla Superchargers were situated in the United States and China, accounting for 65.53% of all Tesla charging stations. The USA had 1,159 Tesla charging facilities, representing 37.88% of all locations, while China had 846, making up 27.65% of all Superchargers. Canada had 125, or 4.08% of all Tesla Supercharger locations.

    Tesla manufactures electric vehicles in three countries: the United States, China, and Germany, utilizing a total of six manufacturing facilities. Four of these facilities have been fully operational for several years. In addition to the original Fremont Factory in California, Tesla has added three more operating manufacturing facilities: Gigafactory Nevada, Gigafactory New York, and Gigafactory Shanghai in 2016, 2017, and 2018, respectively. Across its Fremont and Shanghai locations, Tesla has installed an annual production capacity of 1.5 million cars.

    Gigafactory Berlin-Brandenburg in Germany was officially inaugurated on March 22, 2022. This factory is designed to produce batteries, battery packs, and powertrains for use in Tesla vehicles additionally, the first Model Y Performance with 2170-cells was manufactured in April 2022 at this location.

    Gigafactory Texas, near Austin, Texas, commenced limited production of the Model Y toward the end of 2021, with the first deliveries of electric vehicles from this factory occurring on April 7, 2022. Gigafactory Texas is also intended to be the primary site for the production of the Tesla Cybertruck and the Tesla Semi, as well as the location of Tesla’s corporate headquarters. It is the second largest factory in the United States by size and the second largest building in the world by volume.

    Tesla has updated the Model 3, which made its debut in late 2023. These updates consisted of a completely redesigned yet familiar exterior, new interior technology, and new technical enhancements at reduced production costs. This made the latest Model 3 a fantastic vehicle with new features and a price tag below $40,000, but that has recently and quietly come to an end.

    Although Tesla did not officially announce the discontinuation of any model, the base Standard model is no longer up for grabs. Instead, it has been substituted with the Model 3 Long Range Rear-Wheel-Drive with an MSRP of $42,500, which is $3,500 more than the previous Standard trim. Despite Tesla’s assertion that the Model 3 was manufactured at a reduced cost, it seems that the Standard Model would have ultimately become more expensive to produce.

    This model’s battery technology has been discontinued

    The Standard Model 3 utilized LFP (lithium iron phosphate) battery cells that were obtained from China. This allowed Tesla to manufacture their vehicles at a subsidized rate, but there was a downside to using these batteries. Vehicles with these batteries did not qualify for the $7,500 tax credit available to EV owners, and this included the Standard Model 3. Additionally, the Biden administration has imposed higher import tariffs on Chinese-made products, including batteries.

    These additional costs and the absence of incentives would have resulted in the cheapest Model 3 becoming quite expensive over time. It simply did not make sense, so Tesla decided to eliminate this model in favor of the next vehicle, which featured superior batteries and could easily qualify for EV tax incentives.

    While the Long Range Rear-Wheel Drive Model may be pricier, it provides significantly more value than the initial price suggests. Firstly, it offers 91 miles more range at 363 miles compared to 272 for the Standard model. This is due to the utilization of NCA (nickel cobalt aluminum) batteries in this model, which are produced in the United States. Not only does it offer much more range, but it also assists Tesla in keeping production costs low, enabling you to still own an affordable Tesla EV.

    The most significant advantage of this change is that the cheapest Model 3 is finally able to take advantage of the $7,500 government tax credit available to eligible EV owners. This means that you could purchase a new Model 3 Long Range at an MSRP of around $35,000, which is $4,000 less than the previous Standard model, but with additional range, performance, improved technology, and features. With this move, the Tesla Model 3 may very well maintain its position as the best value-packed EV on the market. Tesla’s sales have been thriving, and we might witness another surge in demand for the beloved Model 3.

    With the EV market expanding day by day, it has never been more challenging to select the right model for you. One safe bet is to consider one of Tesla’s models, as they not only offer a comprehensive EV package with a wide range of refinements and good range, but they are also competitively priced.

    Although they do not contain as many moving parts as vehicles with traditional internal combustion engines, there are still maintenance expenses to take into account in other areas. In fact, studies indicate that new EVs can be three times as problematic as ICE vehicles.

    These include the typical components found in any car, such as suspension, as well as the electric powertrain, which can still experience issues. CarBuzz decided to determine the Tesla model with the lowest maintenance costs in 2024.

    For those seeking to minimize their expenses on a new electric vehicle, the fact that Tesla’s most affordable model is also the most cost-effective to operate should be welcome news. The Model 3 was initially introduced in 2017 as Tesla’s entry-level offering, positioned below the Model S.

    It is spacious enough for medium-sized families to use on a daily basis. There are several versions available, with the most affordable being the long-range rear-wheel drive model. This is equipped with a single-motor powertrain producing 280 hp. This is sufficient to propel it to 60 mph in 4.9 seconds, which should be more than adequate for performance-oriented parents.

    If this seems somewhat underwhelming, Tesla also offers a long-range AWD version and the Performance variant. Both feature a dual-motor powertrain, with the latter boasting an impressive 510 hp while the former has 350 hp. The contrast is striking, with the Performance capable of accelerating to 60 mph in just 2.9 seconds, while the AWD achieves this in 4.2 seconds.

    When factoring in the US government EV grant, they are also reasonably priced in comparison to their closest competitors. The base RWD model can be purchased for just $35,000, while a Performance model will set you back a tempting $47,000. The standard AWD model falls between them at just under $40,000. The range is also impressive across the three models, with the RWD capable of covering 363 miles on a single charge.

    In late 2023, Tesla made updates to the Model 3, which included a redesigned exterior, new interior technology, and technical improvements at lower production costs. However, the latest Model 3 with a sub-$40,000 price tag has been quietly discontinued.

    Although Tesla did not officially announce the discontinuation of any models, the base Standard Model 3 is no longer available for purchase. It has been replaced by the Model 3 Long Range Rear-Wheel-Drive, priced at $42,500, which is $3,500 more than the previous Standard trim. Despite Tesla’s claim that the Model 3 was built at a reduced cost, the Standard Model’s production would have become more expensive over time.

    The Standard Model 3 used LFP (lithium iron phosphate) battery cells sourced from China, which allowed Tesla to build their vehicles at a subsidized rate. However, vehicles with these batteries did not qualify for the $7,500 tax credit available to EV owners, and the Biden administration imposed higher import tariffs on Chinese-made products, including batteries.

    These additional costs and lack of incentives would have made the cheapest Model 3 quite expensive over time. Therefore, Tesla decided to discontinue this model in favor of a new vehicle with better batteries that could easily qualify for EV tax incentives.

    Although the Long Range Rear-Wheel-Drive Model may be more expensive, it offers more value than its initial price suggests. It provides 91 miles more range at 363 miles compared to the 272 miles of the Standard model. This is due to the NCA (nickel cobalt aluminum) batteries used in this model, which are produced in America. Not only does it offer more range, but it also helps Tesla keep production costs low, making it an affordable Tesla EV.

    The most significant advantage of this change is that the cheapest Model 3 is now eligible for the $7,500 government tax credit available to eligible EV owners. This means you could get a brand-new Model 3 Long Range at an MSRP of around $35,000, which is $4,000 less than the previous Standard model but with more range, performance, better technology, and features. With this move, the Tesla Model 3 may very well retain its position as the best value-packed EV on sale. Tesla sales have been booming, and we may see another rise in demand for the beloved Model 3.

    With the EV market expanding, it’s becoming increasingly challenging to choose the right model for you. Tesla’s models offer a comprehensive EV package with a wide range of refinements, good range, and competitive pricing, making them a safe option.

    While EVs have fewer moving parts than vehicles with traditional internal combustion engines, they still incur maintenance costs in other areas, such as suspension and the electric powertrain. Studies show that new EVs can be three times as problematic as ICE vehicles.

    For those looking to spend as little as possible on a new electric vehicle, the fact that Tesla’s cheapest model is also the most affordable to run should be welcome news. The Model 3, introduced in 2017 as Tesla’s entry-level offering below the Model S, is large enough for medium-sized families to use daily. It has multiple versions available, with the cheapest being the long-range rear-wheel drive model, equipped with a single-motor powertrain producing 280 hp. This is sufficient to propel it to 60 mph in 4.9 seconds, suitable for performance-focused parents.

    For those seeking more power, Tesla also offers a long-range AWD version and the Performance variant, both featuring a dual-motor powertrain. The Performance variant boasts 510 hp, while the AWD version has 350 hp. The Performance can sprint to 60 mph in just 2.9 seconds, while the AWD takes 4.2 seconds.

    Taking into account the US government EV grant, these models are also affordable compared to their closest rivals. A base RWD model can be purchased for just $35,000, while a Performance variant will cost $47,000. The normal AWD version falls between them at just under $40,000. The range is also impressive across the three models, with the RWD capable of 363 miles on a single charge.

    The heavier AWD, now eligible for the $7,500 EV tax credit once more, can cover 341 miles, while the Performance model can travel 303 miles.

    If all this seems impressive, it gets even better when considering the projected maintenance expenses for the car. As per CarEdge, maintaining a Model 3 over a decade is estimated to cost only $5,381, which is more than $4,000 less than the class average. This cost comparison includes regular gas-powered vehicles in the luxury sedan category, demonstrating the significant savings that electric vehicles can offer when factoring in maintenance.

    This point is further emphasized by the Model 3’s low 13.45% likelihood of experiencing a major malfunction over this period, which is notably lower than its closest competitors by 13.12%. It also solidifies the Model 3 as the most cost-effective Tesla to maintain over extended periods, making it an ideal choice for families with limited disposable income.

    Regarding charging, the cost depends on whether you have a home charger and your location among the 50 states. Home charging not only revolutionizes the experience but also provides the most economical charging option. Hawaii is the most expensive state for charging an electric vehicle, but even there, substantial savings can be expected compared to a gas-powered car.

    The 2024 Model 3 has experienced minimal recalls thus far

    While the Model 3 does not have a large number of serious reliability issues, it has been subject to several recalls for relatively minor issues. Most of these have been addressed over the years through software updates or design adjustments. Some recalls were issued for the 2024 model, according to RepairPal. For instance, there was an issue with the hood latch assembly failing to register if the hood wasn’t shut properly, which was resolved through a software update.

    Another recall involved a single vehicle missing a gas deflector in the side airbag system, which could hinder its proper functioning in the event of a collision. Although this was fixed in April, concerned customers can reach out to Tesla’s service department for more details about the issue. Thus far, only one vehicle has been found to have this problem.

    While the projected figures are promising, firsthand reviews are invaluable. Fortunately, the majority of 2024 Tesla Model 3 owners validate the car’s strong reliability record. Kelley Blue Book, which aggregates feedback from car owners, reports that out of 186 Model 3 drivers who left reviews, 167 awarded it a four or five-star rating.

    A total of 17 drivers gave three stars or less. This resulted in the Model 3 receiving a reliability rating of 4.6 out of 5 stars. Most negative reviews focused on the Model 3’s build quality. For example, one owner mentioned experiencing a seat belt failure that had to be rectified by Tesla. Another reported three defects within a year of ownership, including one related to the glass roof.

    Another owner expressed frustration with the Tesla’s computer system, stating that their voice control stopped working, and the volume controls were unresponsive. A couple of drivers noticed uneven panel gaps around the car, while another encountered issues with wireless phone charging. Overall, these issues are likely isolated to specific cars, as most owners are satisfied with their Model 3’s quality.

    The Model 3 was one of the top cars in its class. Not only could it outperform most of its competitors in terms of performance, but it was also one of the most affordable options. Additionally, it offered several features not found in other brands. For the 2024 model year, unveiled in September 2023, Tesla claimed to have changed or improved over 50% of the vehicle. This was a bold statement for a car that appeared largely unchanged, yet substantial upgrades were made.

    Like any other facelift or mid-life cycle update, the car needed to have a distinct appearance. While the overall profile remained the same, as the 2024 Model 3 was built on the same platform and structure, there were other exterior details that set the new model apart from its predecessor. The American brand redesigned the headlights, making them slimmer and more stylish. Additionally, more prominent LED daytime running lights were added inside the headlights. The new headlights necessitated a redesigned bumper, which became slimmer and wider, and the fog lamps were removed.

    The car manufacturer deemed them ineffective. Tesla included new wheels in its lineup, available in sizes up to 19 inches and featuring a multi-spoke design. Interestingly, the taillights were positioned on the tailgate at the rear. Red fog lamps were also added to the lower bumper by the manufacturer, as they were required by law in most regions worldwide.

    Internally, the dashboard closely resembled the one in the pre-facelift version, but it was actually new. The design concept was similar, featuring a plain, flat area that now had an LED strip running along the base of the windshield, between the A-pillars. Additionally, a new steering wheel design with integrated buttons for turn signals and cruise control was introduced.

    In the 2024 Model 3, Tesla eliminated all the column-mounted stalks and even relocated the windshield wipers to the redesigned steering wheel. A new center console was installed between the front seats, providing a storage compartment and a pair of cup holders. Furthermore, the manufacturer upgraded the touchscreen in the center stack, maintaining the same size but offering improved image quality.

    Another significant enhancement was the introduction of a color touchscreen for rear-seated passengers, allowing them to control vents and the stereo system.

    Although the updated version retained the same engines and batteries, it was capable of achieving a range of up to 423 miles (678 km). Conversely, the base model allowed the vehicle to travel 346 miles (554 km) on a single charge.

    Unleashing the Future: How Electric Vehicle (EV) Batteries Are Revolutionizing Transportation

    Electric vehicle (EV) batteries are transforming the way we think about transportation. As the world shifts towards sustainable energy solutions, the development of advanced battery technologies is playing a pivotal role in driving this change.

    From lithium-ion to solid-state batteries, the continuous innovations in battery technology are not only extending the range of EVs but also enhancing their performance and reducing charging times. One of the most significant impacts of EV batteries is their contribution to reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

    By powering vehicles with clean energy, EV batteries are helping to mitigate the environmental impact of traditional gasoline-powered vehicles. This shift towards electrification is not only beneficial for the environment but also for the overall well-being of communities, as it reduces air pollution and promotes cleaner urban spaces.

    Moreover, the integration of smart grid technologies with EV batteries is opening up new opportunities for energy storage and grid stabilization. Through vehicle-to-grid (V2G) technologies, EVs can serve as mobile energy storage units, contributing to the stability of the overall energy grid.

    This bi-directional flow of energy enables EV owners to not only power their vehicles but also to supply energy back to the grid during peak demand, thus creating a more resilient and adaptable energy infrastructure. In addition, the evolution of EV batteries is driving advancements in renewable energy integration.

    By coupling EV charging stations with solar and wind power generation, it is possible to create interconnected systems that utilize clean energy sources for both transportation and electricity generation. This convergence of technologies is fostering a more sustainable and decentralized energy ecosystem, enabling individuals and communities to actively participate in the energy transition.

    As EV batteries continue to evolve, they are poised to have a profound impact on the future of transportation and energy. The ongoing research and development in battery technologies are paving the way for a more sustainable and efficient mobility landscape, where electric vehicles play a central role in shaping the future of transportation.

    From Zero to Hero: The Rise of EV Batteries in Sustainable Energy The increasing demand for electric vehicles (EVs) has driven the rapid development of EV batteries, making them a pivotal component in sustainable energy solutions. As the automotive industry shifts towards electrification, EV batteries have emerged as a game-changing technology, offering higher energy density, longer lifespan, and faster charging capabilities. This transformation has been instrumental in reducing carbon emissions and curbing reliance on fossil fuels, thus paving the way for a greener and more sustainable future.

Exit mobile version